feat: Add Python helper scripts#191
Conversation
|
Hey @KrystofS — thanks for this, and for the thoughtful comments on #153. We've got four PRs for Windows support now (#171, #172, #190, #191). I've left a comment on #153 asking everyone to converge on one approach. Your maintainability argument for Python is compelling — would love you to make the case there so the group can align. |
|
Heads up: we're consolidating the Windows support conversation into a single Discussion: #197 — please weigh in there so we can align on one approach. |
|
Hey @KrystofS — thanks for the Python approach here, and sorry this sat so long. As mentioned in my earlier comment, we consolidated the Windows support conversation into Discussion #197 since there were four competing PRs. I'm closing the open Windows PRs now to keep things tidy. Your Python-based approach is one of the options being considered — please weigh in on the discussion if you haven't already: #197 |
|
@msitarzewski I've weighed in with my opinion and the community seems to agree. |
What does this PR do?
Converts the existing Bash integration scripts (
scripts/*.sh) into cross-platform Python equivalents (scripts/*.py).This provides support for Windows users, while preserving the original .sh files so existing UNIX workflows remain unbroken. The new Python scripts have zero third-party dependencies and support Python 3.7+ out of the box.
Key script additions:
The README.md has also been updated to offer the
pythoncommands as explicit alternatives alongside the .sh guides.Agent Information (if adding/modifying an agent)
Checklist
name,description, color