Enable board specific config setting along with the jack #4
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… jack Signed-off-by: Mohammad Rafi Shaik <[email protected]>
mohsRafi
force-pushed
the
common_machine_driver_for_jack
branch
from
0884ac8 to
9f5270f
Compare
nandamajay
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 1, 2025
On completion of i915_vma_pin_ww(), a synchronous variant of dma_fence_work_commit() is called. When pinning a VMA to GGTT address space on a Cherry View family processor, or on a Broxton generation SoC with VTD enabled, i.e., when stop_machine() is then called from intel_ggtt_bind_vma(), that can potentially lead to lock inversion among reservation_ww and cpu_hotplug locks. [86.861179] ====================================================== [86.861193] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [86.861209] 6.15.0-rc5-CI_DRM_16515-gca0305cadc2d+ #1 Tainted: G U [86.861226] ------------------------------------------------------ [86.861238] i915_module_loa/1432 is trying to acquire lock: [86.861252] ffffffff83489090 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: stop_machine+0x1c/0x50 [86.861290] but task is already holding lock: [86.861303] ffffc90002e0b4c8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: i915_vma_pin.constprop.0+0x39/0x1d0 [i915] [86.862233] which lock already depends on the new lock. [86.862251] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [86.862265] -> #5 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [86.862292] dma_resv_lockdep+0x19a/0x390 [86.862315] do_one_initcall+0x60/0x3f0 [86.862334] kernel_init_freeable+0x3cd/0x680 [86.862353] kernel_init+0x1b/0x200 [86.862369] ret_from_fork+0x47/0x70 [86.862383] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [86.862399] -> #4 (reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}: [86.862425] dma_resv_lockdep+0x178/0x390 [86.862440] do_one_initcall+0x60/0x3f0 [86.862454] kernel_init_freeable+0x3cd/0x680 [86.862470] kernel_init+0x1b/0x200 [86.862482] ret_from_fork+0x47/0x70 [86.862495] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [86.862509] -> #3 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}: [86.862531] down_read_killable+0x46/0x1e0 [86.862546] lock_mm_and_find_vma+0xa2/0x280 [86.862561] do_user_addr_fault+0x266/0x8e0 [86.862578] exc_page_fault+0x8a/0x2f0 [86.862593] asm_exc_page_fault+0x27/0x30 [86.862607] filldir64+0xeb/0x180 [86.862620] kernfs_fop_readdir+0x118/0x480 [86.862635] iterate_dir+0xcf/0x2b0 [86.862648] __x64_sys_getdents64+0x84/0x140 [86.862661] x64_sys_call+0x1058/0x2660 [86.862675] do_syscall_64+0x91/0xe90 [86.862689] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [86.862703] -> #2 (&root->kernfs_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}: [86.862725] down_write+0x3e/0xf0 [86.862738] kernfs_add_one+0x30/0x3c0 [86.862751] kernfs_create_dir_ns+0x53/0xb0 [86.862765] internal_create_group+0x134/0x4c0 [86.862779] sysfs_create_group+0x13/0x20 [86.862792] topology_add_dev+0x1d/0x30 [86.862806] cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x4b5/0x850 [86.862822] cpuhp_issue_call+0xbf/0x1f0 [86.862836] __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x111/0x320 [86.862852] __cpuhp_setup_state+0xb0/0x220 [86.862866] topology_sysfs_init+0x30/0x50 [86.862879] do_one_initcall+0x60/0x3f0 [86.862893] kernel_init_freeable+0x3cd/0x680 [86.862908] kernel_init+0x1b/0x200 [86.862921] ret_from_fork+0x47/0x70 [86.862934] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [86.862947] -> #1 (cpuhp_state_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [86.862969] __mutex_lock+0xaa/0xed0 [86.862982] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 [86.862995] __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x67/0x320 [86.863012] __cpuhp_setup_state+0xb0/0x220 [86.863026] page_alloc_init_cpuhp+0x2d/0x60 [86.863041] mm_core_init+0x22/0x2d0 [86.863054] start_kernel+0x576/0xbd0 [86.863068] x86_64_start_reservations+0x18/0x30 [86.863084] x86_64_start_kernel+0xbf/0x110 [86.863098] common_startup_64+0x13e/0x141 [86.863114] -> #0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}: [86.863135] __lock_acquire+0x1635/0x2810 [86.863152] lock_acquire+0xc4/0x2f0 [86.863166] cpus_read_lock+0x41/0x100 [86.863180] stop_machine+0x1c/0x50 [86.863194] bxt_vtd_ggtt_insert_entries__BKL+0x3b/0x60 [i915] [86.863987] intel_ggtt_bind_vma+0x43/0x70 [i915] [86.864735] __vma_bind+0x55/0x70 [i915] [86.865510] fence_work+0x26/0xa0 [i915] [86.866248] fence_notify+0xa1/0x140 [i915] [86.866983] __i915_sw_fence_complete+0x8f/0x270 [i915] [86.867719] i915_sw_fence_commit+0x39/0x60 [i915] [86.868453] i915_vma_pin_ww+0x462/0x1360 [i915] [86.869228] i915_vma_pin.constprop.0+0x133/0x1d0 [i915] [86.870001] initial_plane_vma+0x307/0x840 [i915] [86.870774] intel_initial_plane_config+0x33f/0x670 [i915] [86.871546] intel_display_driver_probe_nogem+0x1c6/0x260 [i915] [86.872330] i915_driver_probe+0x7fa/0xe80 [i915] [86.873057] i915_pci_probe+0xe6/0x220 [i915] [86.873782] local_pci_probe+0x47/0xb0 [86.873802] pci_device_probe+0xf3/0x260 [86.873817] really_probe+0xf1/0x3c0 [86.873833] __driver_probe_device+0x8c/0x180 [86.873848] driver_probe_device+0x24/0xd0 [86.873862] __driver_attach+0x10f/0x220 [86.873876] bus_for_each_dev+0x7f/0xe0 [86.873892] driver_attach+0x1e/0x30 [86.873904] bus_add_driver+0x151/0x290 [86.873917] driver_register+0x5e/0x130 [86.873931] __pci_register_driver+0x7d/0x90 [86.873945] i915_pci_register_driver+0x23/0x30 [i915] [86.874678] i915_init+0x37/0x120 [i915] [86.875347] do_one_initcall+0x60/0x3f0 [86.875369] do_init_module+0x97/0x2a0 [86.875385] load_module+0x2c54/0x2d80 [86.875398] init_module_from_file+0x96/0xe0 [86.875413] idempotent_init_module+0x117/0x330 [86.875426] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x77/0x100 [86.875440] x64_sys_call+0x24de/0x2660 [86.875454] do_syscall_64+0x91/0xe90 [86.875470] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [86.875486] other info that might help us debug this: [86.875502] Chain exists of: cpu_hotplug_lock --> reservation_ww_class_acquire --> reservation_ww_class_mutex [86.875539] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [86.875552] CPU0 CPU1 [86.875563] ---- ---- [86.875573] lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex); [86.875588] lock(reservation_ww_class_acquire); [86.875606] lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex); [86.875624] rlock(cpu_hotplug_lock); [86.875637] *** DEADLOCK *** [86.875650] 3 locks held by i915_module_loa/1432: [86.875663] #0: ffff888101f5c1b0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __driver_attach+0x104/0x220 [86.875699] #1: ffffc90002e0b4a0 (reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: i915_vma_pin.constprop.0+0x39/0x1d0 [i915] [86.876512] #2: ffffc90002e0b4c8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: i915_vma_pin.constprop.0+0x39/0x1d0 [i915] [86.877305] stack backtrace: [86.877326] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1432 Comm: i915_module_loa Tainted: G U 6.15.0-rc5-CI_DRM_16515-gca0305cadc2d+ #1 PREEMPT(voluntary) [86.877334] Tainted: [U]=USER [86.877336] Hardware name: /NUC5CPYB, BIOS PYBSWCEL.86A.0079.2020.0420.1316 04/20/2020 [86.877339] Call Trace: [86.877344] <TASK> [86.877353] dump_stack_lvl+0x91/0xf0 [86.877364] dump_stack+0x10/0x20 [86.877369] print_circular_bug+0x285/0x360 [86.877379] check_noncircular+0x135/0x150 [86.877390] __lock_acquire+0x1635/0x2810 [86.877403] lock_acquire+0xc4/0x2f0 [86.877408] ? stop_machine+0x1c/0x50 [86.877422] ? __pfx_bxt_vtd_ggtt_insert_entries__cb+0x10/0x10 [i915] [86.878173] cpus_read_lock+0x41/0x100 [86.878182] ? stop_machine+0x1c/0x50 [86.878191] ? __pfx_bxt_vtd_ggtt_insert_entries__cb+0x10/0x10 [i915] [86.878916] stop_machine+0x1c/0x50 [86.878927] bxt_vtd_ggtt_insert_entries__BKL+0x3b/0x60 [i915] [86.879652] intel_ggtt_bind_vma+0x43/0x70 [i915] [86.880375] __vma_bind+0x55/0x70 [i915] [86.881133] fence_work+0x26/0xa0 [i915] [86.881851] fence_notify+0xa1/0x140 [i915] [86.882566] __i915_sw_fence_complete+0x8f/0x270 [i915] [86.883286] i915_sw_fence_commit+0x39/0x60 [i915] [86.884003] i915_vma_pin_ww+0x462/0x1360 [i915] [86.884756] ? i915_vma_pin.constprop.0+0x6c/0x1d0 [i915] [86.885513] i915_vma_pin.constprop.0+0x133/0x1d0 [i915] [86.886281] initial_plane_vma+0x307/0x840 [i915] [86.887049] intel_initial_plane_config+0x33f/0x670 [i915] [86.887819] intel_display_driver_probe_nogem+0x1c6/0x260 [i915] [86.888587] i915_driver_probe+0x7fa/0xe80 [i915] [86.889293] ? mutex_unlock+0x12/0x20 [86.889301] ? drm_privacy_screen_get+0x171/0x190 [86.889308] ? acpi_dev_found+0x66/0x80 [86.889321] i915_pci_probe+0xe6/0x220 [i915] [86.890038] local_pci_probe+0x47/0xb0 [86.890049] pci_device_probe+0xf3/0x260 [86.890058] really_probe+0xf1/0x3c0 [86.890067] __driver_probe_device+0x8c/0x180 [86.890072] driver_probe_device+0x24/0xd0 [86.890078] __driver_attach+0x10f/0x220 [86.890083] ? __pfx___driver_attach+0x10/0x10 [86.890088] bus_for_each_dev+0x7f/0xe0 [86.890097] driver_attach+0x1e/0x30 [86.890101] bus_add_driver+0x151/0x290 [86.890107] driver_register+0x5e/0x130 [86.890113] __pci_register_driver+0x7d/0x90 [86.890119] i915_pci_register_driver+0x23/0x30 [i915] [86.890833] i915_init+0x37/0x120 [i915] [86.891482] ? __pfx_i915_init+0x10/0x10 [i915] [86.892135] do_one_initcall+0x60/0x3f0 [86.892145] ? __kmalloc_cache_noprof+0x33f/0x470 [86.892157] do_init_module+0x97/0x2a0 [86.892164] load_module+0x2c54/0x2d80 [86.892168] ? __kernel_read+0x15c/0x300 [86.892185] ? kernel_read_file+0x2b1/0x320 [86.892195] init_module_from_file+0x96/0xe0 [86.892199] ? init_module_from_file+0x96/0xe0 [86.892211] idempotent_init_module+0x117/0x330 [86.892224] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x77/0x100 [86.892230] x64_sys_call+0x24de/0x2660 [86.892236] do_syscall_64+0x91/0xe90 [86.892243] ? irqentry_exit+0x77/0xb0 [86.892249] ? sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x57/0xc0 [86.892256] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [86.892261] RIP: 0033:0x7303e1b2725d [86.892271] Code: ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 8b bb 0d 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 [86.892276] RSP: 002b:00007ffddd1fdb38 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000139 [86.892281] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00005d771d88fd90 RCX: 00007303e1b2725d [86.892285] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00005d771d893aa0 RDI: 000000000000000c [86.892287] RBP: 00007ffddd1fdbf0 R08: 0000000000000040 R09: 00007ffddd1fdb80 [86.892289] R10: 00007303e1c03b20 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00005d771d893aa0 [86.892292] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00005d771d88f0d0 R15: 00005d771d895710 [86.892304] </TASK> Call asynchronous variant of dma_fence_work_commit() in that case. v3: Provide more verbose in-line comment (Andi), - mention target environments in commit message. Fixes: 7d1c261 ("drm/i915: Take reservation lock around i915_vma_pin.") Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/issues/14985 Cc: Andi Shyti <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Sebastian Brzezinka <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Karas <[email protected]> Acked-by: Andi Shyti <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] (cherry picked from commit 648ef13) Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]>
nandamajay
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 1, 2025
Michael Chan says: ==================== bnxt_en: Bug fixes Patches 1, 3, and 4 are bug fixes related to the FW log tracing driver coredump feature recently added in 6.13. Patch #1 adds the necessary call to shutdown the FW logging DMA during PCI shutdown. Patch #3 fixes a possible null pointer derefernce when using early versions of the FW with this feature. Patch #4 adds the coredump header information unconditionally to make it more robust. Patch #2 fixes a possible memory leak during PTP shutdown. Patch #5 eliminates a dmesg warning when doing devlink reload. ==================== Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
nandamajay
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 27, 2026
The GPIO controller is configured as non-sleeping but it uses generic
pinctrl helpers which use a mutex for synchronization.
This can cause the following lockdep splat with shared GPIOs enabled on
boards which have multiple devices using the same GPIO:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
kernel/locking/mutex.c:591
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 12, name:
kworker/u16:0
preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0
6 locks held by kworker/u16:0/12:
#0: ffff0001f0018d48 ((wq_completion)events_unbound#2){+.+.}-{0:0},
at: process_one_work+0x18c/0x604
#1: ffff8000842dbdf0 (deferred_probe_work){+.+.}-{0:0}, at:
process_one_work+0x1b4/0x604
#2: ffff0001f18498f8 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at:
__device_attach+0x38/0x1b0
#3: ffff0001f75f1e90 (&gdev->srcu){.+.?}-{0:0}, at:
gpiod_direction_output_raw_commit+0x0/0x360
#4: ffff0001f46e3db8 (&shared_desc->spinlock){....}-{3:3}, at:
gpio_shared_proxy_direction_output+0xd0/0x144 [gpio_shared_proxy]
#5: ffff0001f180ee90 (&gdev->srcu){.+.?}-{0:0}, at:
gpiod_direction_output_raw_commit+0x0/0x360
irq event stamp: 81450
hardirqs last enabled at (81449): [<ffff8000813acba4>]
_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x74/0x78
hardirqs last disabled at (81450): [<ffff8000813abfb8>]
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x84/0x88
softirqs last enabled at (79616): [<ffff8000811455fc>]
__alloc_skb+0x17c/0x1e8
softirqs last disabled at (79614): [<ffff8000811455fc>]
__alloc_skb+0x17c/0x1e8
CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 12 Comm: kworker/u16:0 Not tainted
6.19.0-rc4-next-20260105+ #11975 PREEMPT
Hardware name: Hardkernel ODROID-M1 (DT)
Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func
Call trace:
show_stack+0x18/0x24 (C)
dump_stack_lvl+0x90/0xd0
dump_stack+0x18/0x24
__might_resched+0x144/0x248
__might_sleep+0x48/0x98
__mutex_lock+0x5c/0x894
mutex_lock_nested+0x24/0x30
pinctrl_get_device_gpio_range+0x44/0x128
pinctrl_gpio_direction+0x3c/0xe0
pinctrl_gpio_direction_output+0x14/0x20
rockchip_gpio_direction_output+0xb8/0x19c
gpiochip_direction_output+0x38/0x94
gpiod_direction_output_raw_commit+0x1d8/0x360
gpiod_direction_output_nonotify+0x7c/0x230
gpiod_direction_output+0x34/0xf8
gpio_shared_proxy_direction_output+0xec/0x144 [gpio_shared_proxy]
gpiochip_direction_output+0x38/0x94
gpiod_direction_output_raw_commit+0x1d8/0x360
gpiod_direction_output_nonotify+0x7c/0x230
gpiod_configure_flags+0xbc/0x480
gpiod_find_and_request+0x1a0/0x574
gpiod_get_index+0x58/0x84
devm_gpiod_get_index+0x20/0xb4
devm_gpiod_get_optional+0x18/0x30
rockchip_pcie_probe+0x98/0x380
platform_probe+0x5c/0xac
really_probe+0xbc/0x298
Fixes: 936ee26 ("gpio/rockchip: add driver for rockchip gpio")
Cc: [email protected]
Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <[email protected]>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
nandamajay
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 27, 2026
…ked_inode() In btrfs_read_locked_inode() we are calling btrfs_init_file_extent_tree() while holding a path with a read locked leaf from a subvolume tree, and btrfs_init_file_extent_tree() may do a GFP_KERNEL allocation, which can trigger reclaim. This can create a circular lock dependency which lockdep warns about with the following splat: [6.1433] ====================================================== [6.1574] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [6.1583] 6.18.0+ #4 Tainted: G U [6.1591] ------------------------------------------------------ [6.1599] kswapd0/117 is trying to acquire lock: [6.1606] ffff8d9b6333c5b8 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x39/0x2f0 [6.1625] but task is already holding lock: [6.1633] ffffffffa4ab8ce0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat+0x195/0xc60 [6.1646] which lock already depends on the new lock. [6.1657] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [6.1667] -> #2 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: [6.1677] fs_reclaim_acquire+0x9d/0xd0 [6.1685] __kmalloc_cache_noprof+0x59/0x750 [6.1694] btrfs_init_file_extent_tree+0x90/0x100 [6.1702] btrfs_read_locked_inode+0xc3/0x6b0 [6.1710] btrfs_iget+0xbb/0xf0 [6.1716] btrfs_lookup_dentry+0x3c5/0x8e0 [6.1724] btrfs_lookup+0x12/0x30 [6.1731] lookup_open.isra.0+0x1aa/0x6a0 [6.1739] path_openat+0x5f7/0xc60 [6.1746] do_filp_open+0xd6/0x180 [6.1753] do_sys_openat2+0x8b/0xe0 [6.1760] __x64_sys_openat+0x54/0xa0 [6.1768] do_syscall_64+0x97/0x3e0 [6.1776] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [6.1784] -> #1 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}: [6.1794] lock_release+0x127/0x2a0 [6.1801] up_read+0x1b/0x30 [6.1808] btrfs_search_slot+0x8e0/0xff0 [6.1817] btrfs_lookup_inode+0x52/0xd0 [6.1825] __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x73/0x520 [6.1833] btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x11a/0x120 [6.1842] btrfs_log_inode+0x608/0x1aa0 [6.1849] btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x249/0xf80 [6.1857] btrfs_log_dentry_safe+0x3e/0x60 [6.1865] btrfs_sync_file+0x431/0x690 [6.1872] do_fsync+0x39/0x80 [6.1879] __x64_sys_fsync+0x13/0x20 [6.1887] do_syscall_64+0x97/0x3e0 [6.1894] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [6.1903] -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [6.1913] __lock_acquire+0x15e9/0x2820 [6.1920] lock_acquire+0xc9/0x2d0 [6.1927] __mutex_lock+0xcc/0x10a0 [6.1934] __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x39/0x2f0 [6.1944] btrfs_evict_inode+0x20b/0x4b0 [6.1952] evict+0x15a/0x2f0 [6.1958] prune_icache_sb+0x91/0xd0 [6.1966] super_cache_scan+0x150/0x1d0 [6.1974] do_shrink_slab+0x155/0x6f0 [6.1981] shrink_slab+0x48e/0x890 [6.1988] shrink_one+0x11a/0x1f0 [6.1995] shrink_node+0xbfd/0x1320 [6.1002] balance_pgdat+0x67f/0xc60 [6.1321] kswapd+0x1dc/0x3e0 [6.1643] kthread+0xff/0x240 [6.1965] ret_from_fork+0x223/0x280 [6.1287] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [6.1616] other info that might help us debug this: [6.1561] Chain exists of: &delayed_node->mutex --> btrfs-tree-00 --> fs_reclaim [6.1503] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [6.1110] CPU0 CPU1 [6.1411] ---- ---- [6.1707] lock(fs_reclaim); [6.1998] lock(btrfs-tree-00); [6.1291] lock(fs_reclaim); [6.1581] lock(&delayed_node->mutex); [6.1874] *** DEADLOCK *** [6.1716] 2 locks held by kswapd0/117: [6.1999] #0: ffffffffa4ab8ce0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat+0x195/0xc60 [6.1294] #1: ffff8d998344b0e0 (&type->s_umount_key#40){++++}- {3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x37/0x1d0 [6.1596] stack backtrace: [6.1183] CPU: 11 UID: 0 PID: 117 Comm: kswapd0 Tainted: G U 6.18.0+ #4 PREEMPT(lazy) [6.1185] Tainted: [U]=USER [6.1186] Hardware name: ASUS System Product Name/PRIME B560M-A AC, BIOS 2001 02/01/2023 [6.1187] Call Trace: [6.1187] <TASK> [6.1189] dump_stack_lvl+0x6e/0xa0 [6.1192] print_circular_bug.cold+0x17a/0x1c0 [6.1194] check_noncircular+0x175/0x190 [6.1197] __lock_acquire+0x15e9/0x2820 [6.1200] lock_acquire+0xc9/0x2d0 [6.1201] ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x39/0x2f0 [6.1204] __mutex_lock+0xcc/0x10a0 [6.1206] ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x39/0x2f0 [6.1208] ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x39/0x2f0 [6.1211] ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x39/0x2f0 [6.1213] __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x39/0x2f0 [6.1215] btrfs_evict_inode+0x20b/0x4b0 [6.1217] ? lock_acquire+0xc9/0x2d0 [6.1220] evict+0x15a/0x2f0 [6.1222] prune_icache_sb+0x91/0xd0 [6.1224] super_cache_scan+0x150/0x1d0 [6.1226] do_shrink_slab+0x155/0x6f0 [6.1228] shrink_slab+0x48e/0x890 [6.1229] ? shrink_slab+0x2d2/0x890 [6.1231] shrink_one+0x11a/0x1f0 [6.1234] shrink_node+0xbfd/0x1320 [6.1236] ? shrink_node+0xa2d/0x1320 [6.1236] ? shrink_node+0xbd3/0x1320 [6.1239] ? balance_pgdat+0x67f/0xc60 [6.1239] balance_pgdat+0x67f/0xc60 [6.1241] ? finish_task_switch.isra.0+0xc4/0x2a0 [6.1246] kswapd+0x1dc/0x3e0 [6.1247] ? __pfx_autoremove_wake_function+0x10/0x10 [6.1249] ? __pfx_kswapd+0x10/0x10 [6.1250] kthread+0xff/0x240 [6.1251] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [6.1253] ret_from_fork+0x223/0x280 [6.1255] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [6.1257] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [6.1260] </TASK> This is because: 1) The fsync task is holding an inode's delayed node mutex (for a directory) while calling __btrfs_update_delayed_inode() and that needs to do a search on the subvolume's btree (therefore read lock some extent buffers); 2) The lookup task, at btrfs_lookup(), triggered reclaim with the GFP_KERNEL allocation done by btrfs_init_file_extent_tree() while holding a read lock on a subvolume leaf; 3) The reclaim triggered kswapd which is doing inode eviction for the directory inode the fsync task is using as an argument to btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode() - but in that call chain we are trying to read lock the same leaf that the lookup task is holding while calling btrfs_init_file_extent_tree() and doing the GFP_KERNEL allocation. Fix this by calling btrfs_init_file_extent_tree() after we don't need the path anymore and release it in btrfs_read_locked_inode(). Reported-by: Thomas Hellström <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/[email protected]/ Fixes: 8679d26 ("btrfs: initialize inode::file_extent_tree after i_mode has been set") Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
nandamajay
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 27, 2026
Patch series "mm/hugetlb: fixes for PMD table sharing (incl. using mmu_gather)", v3. One functional fix, one performance regression fix, and two related comment fixes. I cleaned up my prototype I recently shared [1] for the performance fix, deferring most of the cleanups I had in the prototype to a later point. While doing that I identified the other things. The goal of this patch set is to be backported to stable trees "fairly" easily. At least patch #1 and #4. Patch #1 fixes hugetlb_pmd_shared() not detecting any sharing Patch #2 + #3 are simple comment fixes that patch #4 interacts with. Patch #4 is a fix for the reported performance regression due to excessive IPI broadcasts during fork()+exit(). The last patch is all about TLB flushes, IPIs and mmu_gather. Read: complicated There are plenty of cleanups in the future to be had + one reasonable optimization on x86. But that's all out of scope for this series. Runtime tested, with a focus on fixing the performance regression using the original reproducer [2] on x86. This patch (of 4): We switched from (wrongly) using the page count to an independent shared count. Now, shared page tables have a refcount of 1 (excluding speculative references) and instead use ptdesc->pt_share_count to identify sharing. We didn't convert hugetlb_pmd_shared(), so right now, we would never detect a shared PMD table as such, because sharing/unsharing no longer touches the refcount of a PMD table. Page migration, like mbind() or migrate_pages() would allow for migrating folios mapped into such shared PMD tables, even though the folios are not exclusive. In smaps we would account them as "private" although they are "shared", and we would be wrongly setting the PM_MMAP_EXCLUSIVE in the pagemap interface. Fix it by properly using ptdesc_pmd_is_shared() in hugetlb_pmd_shared(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ [1] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ [2] Fixes: 59d9094 ("mm: hugetlb: independent PMD page table shared count") Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Lance Yang <[email protected]> Tested-by: Lance Yang <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Harry Yoo <[email protected]> Tested-by: Laurence Oberman <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <[email protected]> Acked-by: Oscar Salvador <[email protected]> Cc: Liu Shixin <[email protected]> Cc: Uschakow, Stanislav" <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
nandamajay
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 27, 2026
…itives The "valid" readout delay between the two reads of the watchdog is larger than the valid delta between the resulting watchdog and clocksource intervals, which results in false positive watchdog results. Assume TSC is the clocksource and HPET is the watchdog and both have a uncertainty margin of 250us (default). The watchdog readout does: 1) wdnow = read(HPET); 2) csnow = read(TSC); 3) wdend = read(HPET); The valid window for the delta between #1 and #3 is calculated by the uncertainty margins of the watchdog and the clocksource: m = 2 * watchdog.uncertainty_margin + cs.uncertainty margin; which results in 750us for the TSC/HPET case. The actual interval comparison uses a smaller margin: m = watchdog.uncertainty_margin + cs.uncertainty margin; which results in 500us for the TSC/HPET case. That means the following scenario will trigger the watchdog: Watchdog cycle N: 1) wdnow[N] = read(HPET); 2) csnow[N] = read(TSC); 3) wdend[N] = read(HPET); Assume the delay between #1 and #2 is 100us and the delay between #1 and Watchdog cycle N + 1: 4) wdnow[N + 1] = read(HPET); 5) csnow[N + 1] = read(TSC); 6) wdend[N + 1] = read(HPET); If the delay between #4 and #6 is within the 750us margin then any delay between #4 and #5 which is larger than 600us will fail the interval check and mark the TSC unstable because the intervals are calculated against the previous value: wd_int = wdnow[N + 1] - wdnow[N]; cs_int = csnow[N + 1] - csnow[N]; Putting the above delays in place this results in: cs_int = (wdnow[N + 1] + 610us) - (wdnow[N] + 100us); -> cs_int = wd_int + 510us; which is obviously larger than the allowed 500us margin and results in marking TSC unstable. Fix this by using the same margin as the interval comparison. If the delay between two watchdog reads is larger than that, then the readout was either disturbed by interconnect congestion, NMIs or SMIs. Fixes: 4ac1dd3 ("clocksource: Set cs_watchdog_read() checks based on .uncertainty_margin") Reported-by: Daniel J Blueman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/ Link: https://patch.msgid.link/87bjjxc9dq.ffs@tglx
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Enable board specific config setting along with the jack