Skip to content

Add MCP-Defense-Bench#15

Merged
natnew merged 2 commits into
natnew:mainfrom
Gowthaman90:add-mcp-defense-bench
Jul 24, 2026
Merged

Add MCP-Defense-Bench#15
natnew merged 2 commits into
natnew:mainfrom
Gowthaman90:add-mcp-defense-bench

Conversation

@Gowthaman90

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Adds MCP-Defense-Bench under Benchmarks and Evaluations — a vendor-neutral benchmark scoring how much of the Model Context Protocol (MCP) attack surface security proxies, gateways, and scanners actually defend (22-24 vectors), crosswalked to NIST AI RMF and the OWASP LLM/Agentic Top 10. Ships test fixtures, tool adapters, a live leaderboard, and a citable DOI (10.5281/zenodo.21346206). Repo: https://github.com/Gowthaman90/mcp-defense-bench

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adds a new benchmark entry to the repository’s curated Benchmarks and Evaluations section, expanding coverage of security evaluation resources for MCP/tooling attack surfaces.

Changes:

  • Adds “MCP-Defense-Bench” as a new bullet under Benchmarks and Evaluations in README.md.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread README.md
Comment on lines +235 to +239
- [MCP-Defense-Bench](https://github.com/Gowthaman90/mcp-defense-bench) - Vendor-neutral
benchmark scoring how much of the Model Context Protocol (MCP) attack surface security
proxies, gateways, and scanners actually defend (22-24 vectors), crosswalked to NIST AI
RMF and the OWASP LLM/Agentic Top 10; ships test fixtures, tool adapters, a live
leaderboard, and a citable DOI.
@natnew
natnew merged commit 9fc08af into natnew:main Jul 24, 2026
3 checks passed
@natnew

natnew commented Jul 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@Gowthaman90 Thank you for contributing MCP-Defense-Bench under Benchmarks and Evaluations.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants