Skip to content

Conversation

@aprilnovak
Copy link
Collaborator

See #1184

@aprilnovak aprilnovak mentioned this pull request Oct 27, 2025
@moosebuild
Copy link
Collaborator

moosebuild commented Oct 27, 2025

Job Documentation, step Sync to remote on e4cb678 wanted to post the following:

View the site here

This comment will be updated on new commits.

@moosebuild
Copy link
Collaborator

Job Precheck, step Clang format on 26dbc79 wanted to post the following:

Your code requires style changes.

A patch was auto generated and copied here
You can directly apply the patch by running, in the top level of your repository:

curl -s https://mooseframework.inl.gov/cardinal/docs/PRs/1233/clang_format/style.patch | git apply -v

Alternatively, with your repository up to date and in the top level of your repository:

git clang-format 19afc122f58687962fcbb152316288e89bd52d6d

@aprilnovak
Copy link
Collaborator Author

aprilnovak commented Oct 27, 2025

I am having a hard time getting reproducibility with these tests. On the testing machine, the first OpenMC run prints out identical values for k batch by batch, but as soon as the second run begins, the k printed out does not match any more with the same simulation on my local machine. I am guessing this is due to some floating point issue. @pshriwise I know we have seen this before with highly-scattering problems; in this PR, I am seeing it with an LWR problem and a pure-metal Pu problem. I'm not really sure how to get around this...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants