-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 63
Criticality search #1233
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: devel
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Criticality search #1233
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Kevin Sawatzky <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Paul Wilson <[email protected]>
ea3c7c9 to
ff0e44e
Compare
|
Job Documentation, step Sync to remote on e4cb678 wanted to post the following: View the site here This comment will be updated on new commits. |
|
Job Precheck, step Clang format on 26dbc79 wanted to post the following: Your code requires style changes. A patch was auto generated and copied here
Alternatively, with your repository up to date and in the top level of your repository:
|
|
I am having a hard time getting reproducibility with these tests. On the testing machine, the first OpenMC run prints out identical values for k batch by batch, but as soon as the second run begins, the k printed out does not match any more with the same simulation on my local machine. I am guessing this is due to some floating point issue. @pshriwise I know we have seen this before with highly-scattering problems; in this PR, I am seeing it with an LWR problem and a pure-metal Pu problem. I'm not really sure how to get around this... |
See #1184