Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add more style fixes #464

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 15, 2024
Merged

Add more style fixes #464

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 15, 2024

Conversation

nvitucci
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@fiquick
Copy link
Contributor

fiquick commented Oct 1, 2024

@nvitucci hey, is there any thing else we need to do here?

@nvitucci
Copy link
Contributor Author

nvitucci commented Oct 1, 2024

@nvitucci hey, is there any thing else we need to do here?

No, you can go on and accept the changes if that's fine with you.

@fiquick fiquick self-requested a review October 1, 2024 09:57
@fiquick
Copy link
Contributor

fiquick commented Oct 1, 2024

OK, I just think there are 2 you could take a look at where it's added
pass:[]
pass:[]

Copy link
Contributor

@fiquick fiquick left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok!

@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ To clone an instance protected by a Customer Managed Key, the key must be valid
The cloned instance, by default, uses the available Customer Managed Key for that region and product.

It is best practice to use the same CMK key as the instance it’s being cloned from.
You can override this to use another CMK key - but you can not use the Neo4j Managed Key.
You can override this to use another CMK key--but you can not use the Neo4j Managed Key.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It added an addition dash - on line 50

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, this would be the correct way to insert an emdash in Asciidoc.

@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ Move through the tabs to enable to following:
.. Inside the key vault, go to *Access Control (IAM)* and *add role assignment*.
.. In the *Role* tab, select *Key Vault Administrator*.
.. In the *Member* tab, select *User, group, or service principal*.
.. *Select members* and select yourself or the relevant person, then *Review + Assign*.
.. Select *Select members* and select yourself or the relevant person, then *Review + Assign*.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

too many uses of the word "select" on this line

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

True, but there is "Select" (the action) and the "Select members" (the text for the button). I think this is consistent for example with the suggestion in the Google style guide.

Maybe there is a better way to rephrase?

modules/ROOT/pages/platform/security/encryption.adoc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@neo-technology-commit-status-publisher
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the documentation updates.

The preview documentation has now been torn down - reopening this PR will republish it.

@nvitucci nvitucci merged commit 7c701d3 into neo4j:main Oct 15, 2024
4 checks passed
@nvitucci nvitucci deleted the more-style-fixes-2 branch October 15, 2024 10:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants