-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add fq lint #57
base: dev
Are you sure you want to change the base?
add fq lint #57
Conversation
|
I see that the By adding this to the
|
Do you need to update the README.md |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks a lot for your contribution!
Like with your other PR, you are missing a module config. Therefore, the tool lacks ext.args
and a publishDir
directive. Please see this example from the rnaseq pipline for inspiration - but disregard the complex conditional logic.
As a bare minimum, you should set the --lint-mode log
as ext.args
, otherwise the pipeline will crash upon encountering a single invalid read pair. Optionally, you can choose to pick a lower validation level by default.
I am somewhat undecided, whether the output should nonetheless be mixed into the MultiQC channel, although the tool is not supported.
Thanks a lot for the comments and suggestions! I have a question regarding the
Which creates a publishDir for fq/lint output. Should I still define the publishDir for the module separately as suggested? |
added barebones fq/lint module to the pipeline.
looking for feedback to how to implement it.
PR checklist
nf-core lint
).nf-test test main.nf.test -profile test,docker
).nextflow run . -profile debug,test,docker --outdir <OUTDIR>
).docs/usage.md
is updated.docs/output.md
is updated.CHANGELOG.md
is updated.README.md
is updated (including new tool citations and authors/contributors).