Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency eslint-import-resolver-typescript to v4.2.2 #2479

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 20, 2025

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Mar 18, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
eslint-import-resolver-typescript 4.1.1 -> 4.2.2 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

import-js/eslint-import-resolver-typescript (eslint-import-resolver-typescript)

v4.2.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • #​397 14a7688 Thanks @​JounQin! - chore: bump rspack-resolver for better P'n'P support

    Now rspack-resolver resolves pnpapi natively.

v4.2.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v4.2.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • #​391 c8121e5 Thanks @​JounQin! - feat: make is-bun-module as optional peer dependency

    Technically this is a BREAKING CHANGE, but considering we just raise out v4 recently and this only affects bun users, bun --bun eslint even works without this dependency, so I'd consider this as a minor change.

    So for bun users, there are three options:

    1. install is-bun-module dependency manually and use bun: true option
    2. run eslint with bun --bun eslint w/o bun: true option
    3. enable run#bun in bunfig.toml w/o bun: true option

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 18, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (589f290) to head (0894179).
Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master     #2479   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            8         8           
  Lines          683       683           
  Branches       162       162           
=========================================
  Hits           683       683           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency eslint-import-resolver-typescript to v4.2.0 chore(deps): update dependency eslint-import-resolver-typescript to v4.2.1 Mar 18, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/eslint-import-resolver-typescript-4.x branch from 98d8c91 to dace7c2 Compare March 18, 2025 16:52
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency eslint-import-resolver-typescript to v4.2.1 chore(deps): update dependency eslint-import-resolver-typescript to v4.2.2 Mar 19, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/eslint-import-resolver-typescript-4.x branch from dace7c2 to 0894179 Compare March 19, 2025 06:34
@nicolashenry nicolashenry merged commit 13203ef into master Mar 20, 2025
15 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/eslint-import-resolver-typescript-4.x branch March 20, 2025 12:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant