feat: added resistance to floating windows#3506
Open
Fexaop wants to merge 1 commit intoniri-wm:wip/branchfrom
Open
feat: added resistance to floating windows#3506Fexaop wants to merge 1 commit intoniri-wm:wip/branchfrom
Fexaop wants to merge 1 commit intoniri-wm:wip/branchfrom
Conversation
Contributor
|
I tested this and it works well, although personally I'd prefer a higher threshold (I'm assuming it will be configurable). Currently, resistance applies to working area edges (defined by monitor edges and/or exclusive zones), which means that monitor edges behind an exclusive zone don't have resistance applied. I'm not sure if this is desired, but it's something to think about. |
Author
|
Should I add a config option for threshold? |
Member
|
No config yet please |
Member
Yes, this was my original idea for this indeed |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
for issue #1818