Skip to content

Conversation

@nukdokplex
Copy link
Contributor

@nukdokplex nukdokplex commented Sep 9, 2025

qtct configuration files are generated with pkgs.formats.ini now


added extraQtctConfig option; qtct config is generated with
pkgs.formats.ini now
@stylix-automation stylix-automation bot added topic: home-manager Home Manager target topic: modules /modules/ subsystem labels Sep 9, 2025
@nukdokplex
Copy link
Contributor Author

didn't tested yet, if you did please ping me

Copy link
Contributor

@0xda157 0xda157 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would prefer upstreaming an option into home-manager, similar to #481

Copy link
Member

@trueNAHO trueNAHO left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

didn't tested yet, if you did please ping me

If one of our testbeds includes a Qt application, you can test this PR that way. At least, the following testbeds are failing:

[...] ERROR:nix_fast_build:EVAL: 275 successes, 50 failures
[...] ERROR:nix_fast_build:Failed attributes: .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:ashell:cursorless .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:ashell:light .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:ashell:dark .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:ashell:imageless .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:bat:cursorless .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:bat:dark .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:bat:imageless .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:ashell:schemeless .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:bat:light .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:bat:schemeless .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:bspwm:cursorless .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:bspwm:dark .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:bspwm:imageless .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:bspwm:light .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:bspwm:schemeless .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:dunst:cursorless .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:dunst:dark .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:dunst:imageless .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:dunst:light .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:dunst:schemeless .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:fnott:dark .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:fnott:cursorless .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:fnott:imageless .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:fnott:light .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:fnott:schemeless .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:fuzzel:cursorless .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:fuzzel:dark .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:fuzzel:schemeless .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:fuzzel:light .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:fuzzel:imageless .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:hyprland:cursorless .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:hyprland:dark .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:hyprland:imageless .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:hyprland:schemeless .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:hyprland:light .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:mako:dark .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:mako:cursorless .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:mako:imageless .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:mako:light .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:mako:schemeless .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:waybar:cursorless .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:waybar:dark .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:waybar:light .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:wayprompt:cursorless .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:waybar:schemeless .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:waybar:imageless .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:wayprompt:dark .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:wayprompt:imageless .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:wayprompt:light .#checks.aarch64-linux.testbed:wayprompt:schemeless

I would prefer upstreaming an option into home-manager, similar to #481

Agreed. Although, that is technically out of the scope of this PR.

qtct configuration files are generated with pkgs.formats.ini now

What is the urgency of this change? Does Stylix fail to evaluate without this patch? Ideally, an option is upstreamed to Home Manager, so others also benefit from this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

topic: home-manager Home Manager target topic: modules /modules/ subsystem

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants