Skip to content

Conversation

aduh95
Copy link
Contributor

@aduh95 aduh95 commented Oct 17, 2025

I don't know if we're ever going to get to a point where we can release those lighter releases, but in the mean time, we can use it to get slightly faster CI and guarantee that we are only not using any vendored deps when we want to use shared ones.

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/actions

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added build Issues and PRs related to build files or the CI. meta Issues and PRs related to the general management of the project. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. labels Oct 17, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 17, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 88.03%. Comparing base (9e8c753) to head (13cd8ae).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #60294      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.60%   88.03%   -0.57%     
==========================================
  Files         704      704              
  Lines      208325   208325              
  Branches    40041    39953      -88     
==========================================
- Hits       184581   183407    -1174     
- Misses      15797    16899    +1102     
- Partials     7947     8019      +72     

see 109 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

build Issues and PRs related to build files or the CI. meta Issues and PRs related to the general management of the project. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants