-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 167
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
validator accepts predict_oof as argument #49
Conversation
`validator` was the only function in `validator.py` to not get `predict_oof` as an argument, even though it was already listed as an argument in the function's docstring. This PR adds `predict_oof` as an optional arg to the function header and passes it as an argument to `validator_iterator` inside the function body.
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #49 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage ? 94.49%
=========================================
Files ? 25
Lines ? 1434
Branches ? 192
=========================================
Hits ? 1355
Misses ? 48
Partials ? 31
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, bump version and update changelog
Done |
Status
READY
Background context
validator
was the only function invalidator.py
to not getpredict_oof
as an argument, even though it was already listed as an argument in the function's docstring.Description of the changes proposed in the pull request
This PR adds
predict_oof
as an optional arg to the function header and passes it as an argument tovalidator_iterator
inside the function body.