Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove use of JSONDict for encryption requests field schema; marshmallow Dict field is sufficient. #30

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jun 26, 2023

Conversation

derekpierre
Copy link
Member

@derekpierre derekpierre commented Jun 23, 2023

Don't use a JSONDict for encrypted_decryption_requests field. It causes extra JSON formatting that is unnecessary.

This was an issue found by @piotr-roslaniec .

Additional issues addressed:

  • Remove use of DkgPublicParameters
  • Change dependency to nucypher dkg-dev-7.

@derekpierre derekpierre added the bug 🐛 Something isn't working label Jun 23, 2023
@derekpierre derekpierre self-assigned this Jun 23, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@piotr-roslaniec piotr-roslaniec left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM ✨

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jun 23, 2023

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (development@30a2cd8). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@              Coverage Diff               @@
##             development      #30   +/-   ##
==============================================
  Coverage               ?   87.74%           
==============================================
  Files                  ?       18           
  Lines                  ?      710           
  Branches               ?        0           
==============================================
  Hits                   ?      623           
  Misses                 ?       87           
  Partials               ?        0           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
porter/fields/base.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
porter/schema.py 98.64% <100.00%> (ø)

@KPrasch KPrasch merged commit 0ec1dda into nucypher:development Jun 26, 2023
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug 🐛 Something isn't working
Projects
Status: Completed
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants