Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

storage: omitempty nodeapi.Event alternates #763

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pro-wh
Copy link
Collaborator

@pro-wh pro-wh commented Oct 4, 2024

nodeapi.Event, used in many consensus source storage APIs, get serialized to cache with all these fields having explicit nulls. that increases the sensitivity to field changes. for example, many events cached from the cobalt upgrade had RegistryRuntimeRegistered = null, which causes the deserialization to fail, on events that aren't even related to the registry.

@pro-wh pro-wh added the analysis-layer Analysis layer-related issues. label Oct 4, 2024
GovernanceProposalExecuted *ProposalExecutedEvent
GovernanceProposalFinalized *ProposalFinalizedEvent
GovernanceVote *VoteEvent
StakingTransfer *TransferEvent `json:",omitempty"`
Copy link
Member

@ptrus ptrus Nov 30, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks like we used to have the omitempty annotations here and removed them in 02df003 (by mistake?).

Should we also add them back in other places that were removed (e.g. VRFPubKey field)

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Andrew7234 how did those json annotations come up in the api tests PR?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
analysis-layer Analysis layer-related issues.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants