Modifying the "Reduce ITP with number of active tests per user" #1903
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Linking a bit of discussion on this same PR we already had. #1874 Not sure why we are starting a new PR when the original already started the discussion. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closed it when fishtest was inactive, now re-opened it.
Reasons for this change:
Support for Active Developers:
Penalizing active developers with stringent bounds may discourage contributions. The proposed change ensures a more lenient approach, fostering a supportive environment for developers.
Balancing Act:
The adjustment strikes a balance between encouraging active testing and maintaining reasonable control over the number of tests. It provides a smoother reduction in itp as the number of active tests increases, offering a fair compromise.
Community Feedback:
I suggest seeking feedback from other devs on this proposed change. Open discussions can provide valuable insights and help in refining the formula to better suit the collective needs.