Add statistics for last event

statistics/attendance2024.csv

@@ -14,3 +14,4 @@ Date,Recurring participants,New participants,Total participants
 2024-06-21,12,0,12
 2024-07-05,6,0,6
 2024-07-19,10,0,10
+2024-09-27,5,4,9

statistics/feedback2024.csv

@@ -197,3 +197,14 @@ snacks",
 2024-07-19,2.0,3.0,3.0,3.0,3.0,3.0,3.0,4.0,probably yes,,,
 2024-07-19,3.0,2.0,2.0,3.0,2.0,3.0,2.0,2.0,probably yes,,,
 2024-07-19,4.0,1.0,4.0,3.0,3.0,3.0,1.0,4.0,probably yes,,People,
+2024-09-27,1.0,1.0,4.0,3.0,3.0,3.0,1.0,2.0,probably yes,,"Exchanging the strategies, interaktive Ansatz",Some Background Text or Input on strategies wouldve veen helpful
+2024-09-27,2.0,1.0,3.0,3.0,3.0,3.0,1.0,2.0,probably yes,,Systematic approach to thinking. Thanks so much!,
+2024-09-27,2.0,1.0,3.0,3.0,3.0,4.0,2.0,4.0,probably yes,,"- Thinking logically
+- Deconstruction of problems
+- Focusing on the essential",
+2024-09-27,2.0,1.0,4.0,3.0,3.0,4.0,1.0,2.0,probably yes,,Das Nachdenken und diskutieren ,
+2024-09-27,2.0,2.0,2.0,3.0,3.0,3.0,3.0,2.0,probably yes,,,
+2024-09-27,2.0,2.0,3.0,3.0,3.0,4.0,2.0,2.0,probably yes,,Physics questions,Time management 
+2024-09-27,3.0,1.0,3.0,3.0,3.0,3.0,1.0,3.0,probably yes,,,
+2024-09-27,4.0,1.0,3.0,4.0,3.0,3.0,3.0,5.0,probably yes,,Speculatius,The uncertainty 
+2024-09-27,5.0,2.0,3.0,1.0,3.0,3.0,1.0,3.0,probably yes,,Discussing & explaining,Differences in speed within group

statistics/referrals2024.csv

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 How did you find RatFr?,count
-Internet search,1
+Internet search,2
 Through love,1
-Word of mouth,12
-meetup.com,10
+Word of mouth,14
+meetup.com,11

website/content/events/2024-09-27-thinking-physics-2/statistics/index.md

@@ -0,0 +1,183 @@
+---
+title: "Statistics: Thinking Physics 2"
+date: 2024-09-28T17:05:42+0200
+type: "default"
+toc: true
+summary: "Statistics for the 'Thinking Physics 2' event."
+---
+
+Read more about [this event]({{< ref "events/2024-09-27-thinking-physics-2" >}}).
+
+See also the [2024 summary]({{< ref "posts/statistics-feedback-2024" >}}).
+
+## Attendees
+
+* **Total:** 9 people
+* **Recurring:** 5 people
+* **New:** 4 people
+
+## Feedback
+
+* **Responses:** 9 people (100.00% of attendees)
+
+### 1. Practical use: For my life, what we did today will have ...
+
+* **Responses:** 9 people (100.00% of attendees)
+* **Answers:**
+  * a lot of practical use (1): 1 person
+  * quite a bit of practical use (2): 5 people
+  * some practical use (3): 1 person
+  * little practical use (4): 1 person
+  * very little practical use (5): 1 person
+* **Average answer:** 2.56 (σ=1.24)
+
+![1. Practical use: For my life, what we did today will have ...](./1-practical-use-for-my-life-what-we-did-today-will-have.png)
+
+### 2. The atmosphere / vibe was ...
+
+* **Responses:** 9 people (100.00% of attendees)
+* **Answers:**
+  * fantastic (1): 6 people
+  * good (2): 3 people
+  * okay (3): 0 people
+  * bad (4): 0 people
+  * horrible (5): 0 people
+* **Average answer:** 1.33 (σ=0.50)
+
+![2. The atmosphere / vibe was ...](./2-the-atmosphere-vibe-was.png)
+
+### 3. The amount of content / exercises covered was ...
+
+* **Responses:** 9 people (100.00% of attendees)
+* **Answers:**
+  * way too much (1): 0 people
+  * too much (2): 1 person
+  * just right (3): 6 people
+  * too little (4): 2 people
+  * way too little (5): 0 people
+* **Average answer:** 3.11 (σ=0.60)
+
+![3. The amount of content / exercises covered was ...](./3-the-amount-of-content-exercises-covered-was.png)
+
+### 4. The difficulty level of the content / discussion was ...
+
+* **Responses:** 9 people (100.00% of attendees)
+* **Answers:**
+  * much too easy (1): 1 person
+  * too easy (2): 0 people
+  * just right (3): 7 people
+  * too difficult (4): 1 person
+  * much too difficult (5): 0 people
+* **Average answer:** 2.89 (σ=0.78)
+
+![4. The difficulty level of the content / discussion was ...](./4-the-difficulty-level-of-the-content-discussion-was.png)
+
+### 5. Structure: On the whole the event needed ...
+
+* **Responses:** 9 people (100.00% of attendees)
+* **Answers:**
+  * much more structure (1): 0 people
+  * more structure (2): 0 people
+  * (was just right) (3): 9 people
+  * less structure (4): 0 people
+  * much less structure (5): 0 people
+* **Average answer:** 3.00 (σ=0.00)
+
+![5. Structure: On the whole the event needed ...](./5-structure-on-the-whole-the-event-needed.png)
+
+### 6. The moderation should have been ...
+
+* **Responses:** 9 people (100.00% of attendees)
+* **Answers:**
+  * much more relaxed (1): 0 people
+  * more relaxed (2): 0 people
+  * (was just right) (3): 6 people
+  * more assertive (4): 3 people
+  * much more assertive (5): 0 people
+* **Average answer:** 3.33 (σ=0.50)
+
+![6. The moderation should have been ...](./6-the-moderation-should-have-been.png)
+
+### 7. Host preparation: The content / exercises were ...
+
+* **Responses:** 9 people (100.00% of attendees)
+* **Answers:**
+  * very well prepared (1): 5 people
+  * well prepared (2): 2 people
+  * okay prepared (3): 2 people
+  * not well prepared (4): 0 people
+  * not well prepared at all (5): 0 people
+* **Average answer:** 1.67 (σ=0.87)
+
+![7. Host preparation: The content / exercises were ...](./7-host-preparation-the-content-exercises-were.png)
+
+### 8. Changing your mind: The event made me ...
+
+* **Responses:** 9 people (100.00% of attendees)
+* **Answers:**
+  * question many things (1): 0 people
+  * question some things (2): 5 people
+  * question few things (3): 2 people
+  * question very few things (4): 1 person
+  * not question anything (5): 1 person
+* **Average answer:** 2.78 (σ=1.09)
+
+![8. Changing your mind: The event made me ...](./8-changing-your-mind-the-event-made-me.png)
+
+### 9. Do you think you will come to one (or more) of the next three events?
+
+* **Responses:** 9 people (100.00% of attendees)
+* **Answers:**
+  * probably no: 0 people
+  * probably yes: 9 people
+
+![9. Do you think you will come to one (or more) of the next three events?](./9-do-you-think-you-will-come-to-one-or-more-of-the-next-three-events.png)
+
+### 10. If you answered "probably no" in the previous question or are very uncertain, why is that?
+
+* **Responses:** 0 people (0.00% of attendees)
+* **Answers:**
+  * Friday evening is a bad timeslot for me.: 0 people
+  * I can't fit another activity into my life.: 0 people
+  * I did not like (some of) the people here.: 0 people
+  * I did not like today's venue.: 0 people
+  * I live too far away.: 0 people
+  * I'm not very interested in your usual topics.: 0 people
+  * The level of English is too advanced for me.: 0 people
+
+![10. If you answered "probably no" in the previous question or are very uncertain, why is that?](./10-if-you-answered-probably-no-in-the-previous-question-or-are-very-uncertain-why-is-that.png)
+
+### 11. What did you like the most today?
+
+* **Responses:** 7 people (77.78% of attendees)
+
+**Note:** Anything contained in square brackets [] is an edit by the organizers.
+
+> Exchanging the strategies, interaktive Ansatz
+
+> Systematic approach to thinking. Thanks so much!
+
+> - Thinking logically  
+> - Deconstruction of problems  
+> - Focusing on the essential
+
+> Das Nachdenken und diskutieren 
+
+> Physics questions
+
+> Speculatius
+
+> Discussing & explaining
+### 12. What did you like the least?
+
+* **Responses:** 4 people (44.44% of attendees)
+
+**Note:** Anything contained in square brackets [] is an edit by the organizers.
+
+> Some Background Text or Input on strategies wouldve veen helpful
+
+> Time management 
+
+> The uncertainty 
+
+> Differences in speed within group