Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Access] Add compatible range to Node Version Info endpoint #727

Conversation

UlyanaAndrukhiv
Copy link
Collaborator

@UlyanaAndrukhiv UlyanaAndrukhiv commented Aug 12, 2024

Related PR: onflow/flow-go#6294

Context

In this PR:

  • updated protobuf and flow-go versions

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 35.51%. Comparing base (3f120d3) to head (ccd7c14).
Report is 127 commits behind head on master.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (3f120d3) and HEAD (ccd7c14). Click for more details.

HEAD has 1 upload less than BASE
Flag BASE (3f120d3) HEAD (ccd7c14)
unittests 2 1
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #727       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   51.24%   35.51%   -15.74%     
===========================================
  Files          34       47       +13     
  Lines        4533     7366     +2833     
===========================================
+ Hits         2323     2616      +293     
- Misses       2027     4561     +2534     
- Partials      183      189        +6     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 35.51% <100.00%> (-15.74%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@UlyanaAndrukhiv
Copy link
Collaborator Author

The changes in this PR are included in PR #723

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants