Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use Pebble Database for storing protocol data (Proof of concept) #6161

Closed
wants to merge 165 commits into from

Conversation

zhangchiqing
Copy link
Member

@zhangchiqing zhangchiqing commented Jun 27, 2024

Close #6137

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 43.75%. Comparing base (e31cf85) to head (c0847e3).
Report is 106 commits behind head on v0.33.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (e31cf85) and HEAD (c0847e3). Click for more details.

HEAD has 7 uploads less than BASE | Flag | BASE (e31cf85) | HEAD (c0847e3) | |------|------|------| |unittests|8|1|
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            v0.33    #6161      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   50.97%   43.75%   -7.23%     
==========================================
  Files         281        8     -273     
  Lines       23932      432   -23500     
==========================================
- Hits        12199      189   -12010     
+ Misses      10981      238   -10743     
+ Partials      752        5     -747     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 43.75% <ø> (-7.23%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@zhangchiqing zhangchiqing force-pushed the leo/v0.33-pebble-storage branch from e655476 to 4e77bf6 Compare July 9, 2024 16:39
@zhangchiqing
Copy link
Member Author

Close in favor of #6197

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants