[Access] Add util command to backfill tx error messages db

[UlyanaAndrukhiv]

Closes: #6413

Context

This pull request introduces a utility command that allows ANs to backfill missing transaction error messages from start to end height and a set of ENs to their local databases. This ensures that historical ANs have the necessary data to serve requests moving forward.

The command accepts a list of EN IDs (execution-node-ids) , if not provided, it defaults to query any available EN. It optionally takes a start and end block height (start-height, end-height); if not provided, it defaults to the root block and latest sealed block.

Before execution, the command checks if AN indexing is enabled. For each failed transaction within the block range, it retrieves and stores the error messages locally. It queries ENs in order and stops after the first successful response.

The command uses GetTransactionErrorMessagesByBlockID for optimized batch retrieval.

Unit tests are included to ensure functionality.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 21.42857% with 11 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 40.86%. Comparing base (899e12e) to head (258273c).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
cmd/access/node_builder/access_node_builder.go	0.00%	6 Missing ⚠️
...estion/tx_error_messages/tx_error_messages_core.go	42.85%	3 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
utils/unittest/mocks/closer.go	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #6525      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   41.20%   40.86%   -0.34%     
==========================================
  Files        2052     1988      -64     
  Lines      182191   176363    -5828     
==========================================
- Hits        75075    72078    -2997     
+ Misses     100824    98275    -2549     
+ Partials     6292     6010     -282     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	40.86% <21.42%> (-0.34%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[Guitarheroua]

Looks good, have a few comments!

[peterargue]

added a few comments about language in error messages, but otherwise looks good

[UlyanaAndrukhiv]

@Guitarheroua, @peterargue, I've tested the backfilling of transaction error messages and added an additional integration test TestBackfillTxErrorMessages based on TestAccessStoreTxErrorMessages. This approach made it easier to generate failed transaction results for testing. You can view the commit here: 258273c

[peterargue]

how do you know that these weren't indexed regularly and were actually backfilled?