-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Mason/vercel marketplace docs #87
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Mesa DescriptionThis PR introduces comprehensive documentation for the new Vercel Marketplace integration, replacing the existing placeholder page. The new guide provides a complete walkthrough for users discovering and installing Kernel through Vercel. It covers the entire user journey, from installation and project linking to configuration and usage. Key sections include:
Description generated by Mesa. Update settings |
Mesa DescriptionThis PR adds comprehensive documentation for the Vercel Marketplace integration. The existing The new documentation covers:
Description generated by Mesa. Update settings |
Mesa DescriptionThis PR adds documentation for the Vercel Marketplace integration. It provides a guide for users installing and configuring the integration, covering setup, project linking, and usage examples. Description generated by Mesa. Update settings |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Performed full review of 7154d5f...7824fa9
Analysis
- The analysis doesn't indicate any architectural issues with the pull request, which appears to be documentation-focused rather than code-focused.
- Without more technical details about the actual implementation, it's not possible to identify potential architectural concerns with the Vercel Marketplace integration itself.
- The analysis doesn't address whether the integration approach documented follows best practices for Vercel Marketplace integrations.
- There's no mention of performance implications, security considerations, or potential scalability issues with the documented integration patterns.
- The analysis doesn't evaluate whether the TypeScript and Python code examples follow architectural best practices or could introduce technical debt.
Tip
⚡ Quick Actions
This review was generated by Mesa.
Actions:
Slash Commands:
/review
- Request a full code review/review latest
- Review only changes since the last review/describe
- Generate PR description. This will update the PR body or issue comment depending on your configuration/help
- Get help with Mesa commands and configuration options
1 files reviewed | 0 comments | Review on Mesa | Edit Reviewer Settings
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Left some suggested changes. Overall looks great!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
No description provided.