-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
106 check passing initialized modules #109
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Improve code readability with consistent formatting for conditions, argument alignment, and tensor initialization. Add precise type annotations for `_load_instructions` method to enhance type safety and clarity.
Simplified and modernized the codebase by removing hardcoded classifiers and regressors like LogisticRegression, LinearRegression, and MultiLayerPerceptron. Introduced flexible base classes, dynamic module handling, and incremental capabilities for targets, features, and classes in classification and regression tasks. This improves maintainability and extensibility of the code while ensuring support for complex use cases.
This commit improves overall code readability by adjusting spacing, aligning imports, and refining incosistent formatting like inline comments and function definitions. No functional changes were made; these updates enhance maintainability and coding style adherence across multiple modules.
…mple notebooks for consistency
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
Closed
lucasczz
approved these changes
Mar 21, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @kulbachcedric,
Looks great! Thanks for all the work on this!
Passing initialized modules is definitely more convenient.
Cheers
Lucas
…ved classification
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi @lucasczz and @hoanganhngo610,
I finally managed to refactor the code base to enable passing initialized PyTorch Modules (and some structural changes). What do you think about the changes, where in the future, we would remove and replace the old classes with the *Initialized classes.
The documentation is still missing in many parts, but I think from the coding side it is a first draft to get feedback :-)
Best
Cedric