🌱 chore: add emeritus_approvers to OWNERS file

[mikeshng]

Summary

chore: add emeritus_approvers to OWNERS file

Related issue(s)

Follow up PR to #402

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated project governance configuration by introducing a new approver role designation within the project's approval structure.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The OWNERS file is updated to introduce a new emeritus_approvers governance section with mdelder as an entry. No modifications are made to existing approval or review sections; only the new section is added.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
OWNERS file governance update OWNERS	Added new emeritus_approvers section with mdelder as member

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• open-cluster-management-io/api#402 — Modifies OWNERS file membership for mdelder, removing them from reviewers section in parallel with this PR adding them as an emeritus approver.

Suggested labels

lgtm, approved

Suggested reviewers

• deads2k
• mdelder

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title Check	✅ Passed	The pull request title ":seedling: chore: add emeritus_approvers to OWNERS file" is concise, specific, and directly aligned with the main change. The title accurately describes that a new emeritus_approvers section is being added to the OWNERS file, which matches the raw summary and the actual file modifications. The use of the :seedling: emoji prefix follows the repository's guidelines for categorizing changes as miscellaneous/chore work. The title is clear and scannable without being vague or misleading.
Description Check	✅ Passed	The pull request description follows the required template structure with both mandatory sections present and appropriately filled. The "## Summary" section contains a clear description of the change ("chore: add emeritus_approvers to OWNERS file"), and the "## Related issue(s)" section provides meaningful context by referencing the related PR #402. While the summary is brief, it is adequate for a straightforward chore change and effectively communicates the intent. The description provides sufficient information for reviewers to understand the purpose and context of the change.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1114e82 and a677544.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• OWNERS (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)

• GitHub Check: unit
• GitHub Check: verify

🔇 Additional comments (1)

OWNERS (1)

11-12: The emeritus_approvers field is already established and actively used throughout the codebase—appearing in multiple OWNERS files in both the main repository and Kubernetes vendored packages. The change follows existing patterns and is valid.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[mikeshng]

/assign @qiujian16

[qiujian16]

/approve
/lgtm

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mikeshng, qiujian16

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [qiujian16]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment