Skip to content

Add more complianceType options for better merging with ConfigurationPolicies #130

Closed as not planned

Description

@JustinKuli

The existing musthave, mustonlyhave options are sometimes insufficient. Using mustonlyhave to work around the bespoke merging behavior of musthave requires setting many more fields in the policy, and can result in "thrashing" on the cluster, as the config-policy-controller fights with another controller (sometimes the API server itself) to apply certain configurations.

Options that match kubectl patch behaviors might be easier for users to understand.

Activity

  1. ocm-bot commented on Jul 20, 2026

    @ocm-bot

    This issue/PR is marked stale and will be closed in 30 days unless there is new activity.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions