Skip to content

Conversation

@jonathannorris
Copy link
Member

Summary

Mark @openfeature/multi-provider and @openfeature/multi-provider-web packages as deprecated.

The Multi-Provider functionality is now included directly in the main OpenFeature SDKs:

  • @openfeature/server-sdk
  • @openfeature/web-sdk

@jonathannorris jonathannorris requested review from a team as code owners October 23, 2025 18:01
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @jonathannorris, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request formally deprecates the standalone multi-provider packages for both web and server environments. This change streamlines the OpenFeature ecosystem by consolidating the multi-provider functionality directly into the respective main SDKs, guiding users towards a more integrated and simplified approach for managing multiple feature flag providers.

Highlights

  • Package Deprecation: The @openfeature/multi-provider and @openfeature/multi-provider-web packages have been formally marked as deprecated.
  • Functionality Consolidation: The multi-provider functionality previously offered by these standalone packages is now directly integrated into the main @openfeature/server-sdk and @openfeature/web-sdk.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly marks the @openfeature/multi-provider and @openfeature/multi-provider-web packages as deprecated by adding a deprecated field to their respective package.json files and including a deprecation notice in their READMEs. The changes are straightforward and align with the goal of migrating users to the main SDKs. I've suggested minor improvements to the README files to include direct links to the relevant SDK documentation, which will help users with the migration process.

@toddbaert toddbaert merged commit 5c3799e into main Oct 24, 2025
7 checks passed
@toddbaert toddbaert deleted the chore-deprecate-multi-provider branch October 24, 2025 16:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants