Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

v5.0.x: docs: add some info about HPE CXI ofi provider #12163

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 21, 2023

Conversation

hppritcha
Copy link
Member

and also make a statement about the OFI BTL more accurate.

Related to #12038

Signed-off-by: Howard Pritchard [email protected]
(cherry picked from commit 2718732)

and also make a statement about the OFI BTL more accurate.

Related to open-mpi#12038

Signed-off-by: Howard Pritchard <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 2718732)
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v5.0.1 milestone Dec 14, 2023
@jsquyres jsquyres changed the title docs: add some info about HPE CXI ofi provider v5.0.x: docs: add some info about HPE CXI ofi provider Dec 14, 2023
@@ -76,6 +78,11 @@ list. For example:

shell$ ompi_info --param mtl ofi --level 9

.. important:: When using the HPE CXI provider and ``mpirun`` as the job launcher,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just to be clear: this isn't entirely accurate. You could also simply add --map-by :nouselocal to the mpirun cmd line.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah, if you want to get charged for N+1 vs N nodes where N is the number of nodes available for your MPI processes.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I understand your point - however, your text doesn't indicate that you have a choice. You state that you must use the specified option - and that simply isn't true.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's a fair point. It's probably worth pointing out the subtlety here -- i.e., what does this parameter mean and do, vs. what the user's options are if they don't use this MCA param.

Signed-off-by: Howard Pritchard <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit e583e48)
@wenduwan wenduwan merged commit e0ff2ee into open-mpi:v5.0.x Dec 21, 2023
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants