Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bump experimental api and sdk versions (0.5.2 and 0.5.1) #802

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 19, 2025

Conversation

tsloughter
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@tsloughter tsloughter requested a review from a team as a code owner November 22, 2024 16:06
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 22, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 17.32%. Comparing base (c884b6f) to head (3a60af7).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #802   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   17.32%   17.32%           
=======================================
  Files          24       24           
  Lines         710      710           
=======================================
  Hits          123      123           
  Misses        587      587           
Flag Coverage Δ
api 17.32% <ø> (ø)
elixir 17.32% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@tsloughter tsloughter force-pushed the ts/bump-exp-0.5.2-0.5.1 branch 2 times, most recently from 431a352 to c5a0602 Compare November 23, 2024 18:04
@tsloughter tsloughter force-pushed the ts/bump-exp-0.5.2-0.5.1 branch from 4f14068 to 3a60af7 Compare February 19, 2025 10:30
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the scope-ci label Feb 19, 2025
@tsloughter tsloughter merged commit 7476b83 into main Feb 19, 2025
17 checks passed
@tsloughter tsloughter deleted the ts/bump-exp-0.5.2-0.5.1 branch February 19, 2025 10:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants