Skip to content

Conversation

gkbishnoi07
Copy link
Collaborator

@gkbishnoi07 gkbishnoi07 commented Sep 25, 2025

Description

We need to set up CodeRabbit AI in this repository to automate code reviews and ensure consistent quality without being overly strict. The integration should focus on core code files and exclude non-essential files like documentation and configuration.

Related issues and discussion

WEB-327

Screenshots, if any

Checklist

Please make sure these boxes are checked before submitting your pull request - thanks!

  • If you have multiple commits please combine them into one commit by squashing them.

  • Read and understood the contribution guidelines at web-app/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Added an automated code-review configuration to streamline review workflows (language, early-access, and auto-reply settings).
    • Standardized reviewer guidance covering correctness, readability, maintainability, performance, accessibility, and typing.
    • Scoped reviews to project code paths and excluded non-code assets (e.g., CI/config and image files).
    • Enabled incremental auto-review with branch/user/label filters and finishing-touches toggles for docs and tests.
    • Pre-merge checks configured but disabled; no user-facing functionality changes.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 25, 2025

Walkthrough

Adds a new .coderabbit.yaml configuration defining global settings, review profiles, path filters, reviewer instructions, path-specific rules, auto-review behavior, finishing-touches toggles, and pre-merge check settings.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary of changes
CI/Automation configuration
\.coderabbit.yaml
Adds CodeRabbit configuration with global settings (language, early_access, chat.auto_reply), reviews profiles (poem, profile, high_level_summary, review_status, commit_status, collapse_walkthrough), path_filters (include all, exclude .github and *.svg), broad instructions, path_instructions for src/app/** and *.spec.ts, auto_review rules (incremental, base: dev, ignore/require keywords/labels), finishing_touches toggles (docstrings, unit_tests), and pre_merge_checks (mode: off).

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
  autonumber
  actor Dev as Developer
  participant GH as Git Host
  participant CR as CodeRabbit
  participant PR as Pull Request

  Dev->>GH: Open or update PR
  GH-->>CR: Trigger review pipeline
  CR->>CR: Load `.coderabbit.yaml`
  rect rgba(220,235,255,0.6)
    note right of CR: Apply path_filters & path_instructions
    CR->>PR: Analyze changes per reviews & instructions
  end
  alt Auto-review allowed
    CR->>PR: Post summary, findings, statuses
    CR->>GH: Optionally apply labels/status
  else Excluded or ignored
    CR-->>PR: Skip automated review
  end
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The title clearly and succinctly conveys the primary objective of the changeset—integrating CodeRabbit AI for automated code reviews—and includes the relevant issue identifier (WEB-327) to provide context, making it immediately understandable to collaborators.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5015cc2 and 92df549.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .coderabbit.yaml (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .coderabbit.yaml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Run Lint, Build and Deploy

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 75a4342 and 0340af3.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .coderabbit.yaml (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Run Lint, Build and Deploy

@gkbishnoi07 gkbishnoi07 force-pushed the WEB-327-integrate-code-rabbit-ai-for-automated-code-reviews branch from 0340af3 to 5015cc2 Compare September 26, 2025 10:08
@gkbishnoi07 gkbishnoi07 marked this pull request as draft September 26, 2025 13:00
@gkbishnoi07 gkbishnoi07 marked this pull request as ready for review September 27, 2025 12:00
Copy link
Collaborator

@steinwinde steinwinde left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Apparently CodeRabbit itself has found a problem in this configuration. Due to CodeRabbit probably having some expertise on its own behalf, I suppose there should be something corrected?!

@gkbishnoi07
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Apparently CodeRabbit itself has found a problem in this configuration. Due to CodeRabbit probably having some expertise on its own behalf, I suppose there should be something corrected?!

fixing those issue, thanks

@gkbishnoi07 gkbishnoi07 force-pushed the WEB-327-integrate-code-rabbit-ai-for-automated-code-reviews branch from 5015cc2 to 92df549 Compare September 29, 2025 08:35
@steinwinde steinwinde merged commit 1822d7f into openMF:dev Sep 29, 2025
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants