-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.3k
fix: do not propose to add multiline commands to execpolicy #8734
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
92d947d
core: respect originator override in tests
tibo-openai 26af5ce
tui: truncate exec approval prefix labels
tibo-openai cc95225
Update client.rs
tibo-openai d61bb3f
Update client.rs
tibo-openai 3ab4d97
tui: hide multiline execpolicy prefix option
tibo-openai 62b810b
tui: align multiline execpolicy snapshot
tibo-openai File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
14 changes: 14 additions & 0 deletions
14
...apshots/codex_tui__chatwidget__tests__approval_modal_exec_multiline_prefix_truncates.snap
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ | ||
| --- | ||
| source: tui/src/chatwidget/tests.rs | ||
| expression: contents | ||
| --- | ||
| Would you like to run the following command? | ||
|
|
||
| $ echo hello world | ||
|
|
||
| › 1. Yes, proceed (y) | ||
| 2. Yes, and don't ask again for commands that start with `python - <<'PY' | ||
| xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx... (truncated)` (p) | ||
| 3. No, and tell Codex what to do differently (esc) | ||
|
|
||
| Press enter to confirm or esc to cancel |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
14 changes: 14 additions & 0 deletions
14
...pshots/codex_tui2__chatwidget__tests__approval_modal_exec_multiline_prefix_truncates.snap
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ | ||
| --- | ||
| source: tui2/src/chatwidget/tests.rs | ||
| expression: contents | ||
| --- | ||
| Would you like to run the following command? | ||
|
|
||
| $ echo hello world | ||
|
|
||
| › 1. Yes, proceed (y) | ||
| 2. Yes, and don't ask again for commands that start with `python - <<'PY' | ||
| xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx... (truncated)` (p) | ||
| 3. No, and tell Codex what to do differently (esc) | ||
|
|
||
| Press enter to confirm or esc to cancel |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Personally, I would just do the work to derive
expected_labeland thenassert_eq!(expected_label, label)because then the failure of the assertion has a stronger signal and the difference should be pretty clear when the failure is printed.That said, this is pretty low-risk, so you can also keep it as-is.