Skip to content

Non-record: Mixed-Int6 LZMA9 B3072 Warm5000#1438

Open
sabdulmajid wants to merge 1 commit intoopenai:mainfrom
sabdulmajid:pr/mixed-int6-lzma9-b3072-warm5000
Open

Non-record: Mixed-Int6 LZMA9 B3072 Warm5000#1438
sabdulmajid wants to merge 1 commit intoopenai:mainfrom
sabdulmajid:pr/mixed-int6-lzma9-b3072-warm5000

Conversation

@sabdulmajid
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

Adds a non-record unlimited-compute 16MB submission: Mixed-Int6 LZMA9 B3072 Warm5000.

This is not a 10-minute record attempt, rather a 16.1h single-GPU run using the established EMA + XSA(last-4) + BigramHash3072 + LeakyReLU^2 flat-transformer stack, then exports the preserved raw checkpoint with broad mixed-int6 over mlp;attn;embed and LZMA9 extreme compression.

Result

  • val_bpb: 1.20289664
  • val_loss: 1.99963255
  • pre-quant sliding BPB: 1.16618894
  • artifact bytes: 15,991,188

This beats the listed 4-hour non-record baseline but does not beat the current 1-bit non-record result or the 10-minute SOTA -- was a fun little experiment I trained and ran on limited compute (as a student in college 😃)

Training: NVIDIA RTX A4500, 20GB VRAM
Export & eval: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050, 8GB VRAM

@MatoTeziTanka
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Community Review — Non-record: Mixed-Int6 LZMA9 B3072 Warm5000

BPB: 1.2029 | Compliance: LOOKS CLEAN — score-first-per-chunk TTT (legal #1416/#1423 pattern)

What I found in the code (head SHA 05b511b19db7, file records/track_non_record_16mb/2026-04-07_MixedInt6_LZMA9_B3072_Warm5000/train_gpt.py):

The TTT path at line 1329 implements the score-first-per-chunk pattern: each chunk is scored under torch.no_grad() / inference_mode() before the base_model.train() + SGD adaptation runs on that same chunk, with an is_last_chunk guard so the final chunk gets no adaptation pass. This is the structural shape the legal frontier uses (PRs #1416 erichroepke, #1423 aryanbhosale).

Per Issue #402 and Issue #677, TTT is legal when each token is scored before the adapter updates on it, and that's what the code does here — chunk ci is scored under weights adapted only on chunks 0..ci-1. No prequant_ttt_adapt_adamw(val_tokens, ...) multi-epoch fine-tune, no scored-region SLOT, no target-in-key n-gram cache.

CPU smoke test (CT2038 proteus-engine, 2026-04-11): import OK in 0.06s, dim=512, layers=11, vocab=1024, code=109840 B, SMOKE_TEST_PASS

Verdict: LOOKS CLEAN.

Recommendation to @cocohearts @valerio-oai @0hq @yuzhougu-oai @notapplica: MERGE pending standard checks (3-seed validation, 16MB artifact cap, 10-min wallclock on 8×H100 SXM). The compliance picture matches the legal reference frontier and no flags were raised by the classification pass.

Auto-classification caveat: this review was drafted by the AST-based classifier against a template derived from manually-reviewed cluster PRs (#1420, #1450, #1487, #1541, #1529, #1533, #1518). If I've misread a subtlety in your eval path — e.g., multi-epoch TTT that I mistook for single-pass, or a target-in-key lookup I missed in a helper function — please flag it and I'll re-run the audit manually.


Reviewed by @MatoTeziTankaThe Agora. CPU smoke test (CT2038 proteus-engine, 2026-04-11): import OK in 0.06s, dim=512, layers=11, vocab=1024, code=109840 B, SMOKE_TEST_PASS. Classification via deterministic AST-based classify_prs.py (pattern bank derived from ~65 manually-reviewed PRs earlier in the 2026-04-11 sweep). This review was auto-drafted from a template and spot-checked before posting — if the template misread your code, please call it out so I can iterate the classifier.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants