Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes Image selection dropdown scroll issue #2696

Conversation

manaswinidas
Copy link
Contributor

@manaswinidas manaswinidas commented Apr 10, 2024

Closes: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-3412

Description

Fixes the image selection dropdown scroll issue. Upgraded SimpleDropdownSelect component to PF5.

Screenshot 2024-04-10 at 7 23 06 PM
Screen.Recording.2024-04-10.at.7.23.30.PM.mov

How Has This Been Tested?

Try creating a workbench after creating many custom images using the Notebook images section in the Settings section in the Dashboard. You should see a scroll bar while trying to select images in the Image selection, which doesn't break the layout.

Test Impact

Fixed failing tests due to the PF5 migration. Added new tests for scrollable dropdown selection

Request review criteria:

Self checklist (all need to be checked):

  • The developer has manually tested the changes and verified that the changes work
  • Commits have been squashed into descriptive, self-contained units of work (e.g. 'WIP' and 'Implements feedback' style messages have been removed)
  • Testing instructions have been added in the PR body (for PRs involving changes that are not immediately obvious).
  • The developer has added tests or explained why testing cannot be added (unit or cypress tests for related changes)

If you have UI changes:

  • Included any necessary screenshots or gifs if it was a UI change.
  • Included tags to the UX team if it was a UI/UX change (find relevant UX in the SMEs section).

After the PR is posted & before it merges:

  • The developer has tested their solution on a cluster by using the image produced by the PR to main

Copy link
Contributor

@lucferbux lucferbux left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok a couple of things here:

Have you tested wether this fix the issue? I would think it's still happening if we still have the css.

We should have coverage with mockup data that might be recreating the issue, we can talk about that async if you want.

Is this refactor gonna help other instances of this? Maybe we should just fix the issue of the height and do the refactor in another issue OR just do the refactor in all the instances, but it's not a great idea having both components.

@manaswinidas manaswinidas force-pushed the image-stream-dropdown-scroll branch 3 times, most recently from 2f5bea2 to ec8420b Compare April 11, 2024 17:42
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase PR needs to be rebased label Apr 11, 2024
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase PR needs to be rebased label Apr 11, 2024
@manaswinidas manaswinidas force-pushed the image-stream-dropdown-scroll branch 2 times, most recently from 0b798a8 to 5ed154f Compare April 12, 2024 13:52
Copy link
Contributor

@dpanshug dpanshug left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@manaswinidas
Copy link
Contributor Author

manaswinidas commented Apr 12, 2024

@lucferbux Fixed all test failures arising due to the migration. Added a new test to test scrollable dropdown selection as requested. Even manually tested the views on all the pages, seems to work fine. The CSS file you mentioned seems to fix some width issues instead of height and it's required coz the extra padding persists if we remove that CSS. This is ready for review.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm label Apr 12, 2024
@manaswinidas
Copy link
Contributor Author

/lgtm Readding the label coz the last force-push only included a Cypress function name change from findDropdownItemById to findByDropdownId

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm label Apr 12, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@lucferbux lucferbux left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

Had to check the part of testId prop, but I think that's the only solution we can go for now, since that's how patternfly recommends using the testing id.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Apr 12, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 12, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dpanshug, lucferbux

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 2511b4c into opendatahub-io:main Apr 12, 2024
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants