Add s3 storage artifact route and ui integration of it

[Gkrumbach07]

closes: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-7081

Description

• created a new /api/storage GET route that takes bucket and namespace along with the path as a query param and gives back what is in that s3 bucket.
• using that in compare runs markdown compare and in artifacts list uri link
• added preview and peek file size warnings

How Has This Been Tested?

• go to artifacts list page and navigate to pipelines with output artifacts
  (reach out to @Gkrumbach07 i you need a test cluster for this PR)

Test Impact

no tests add bc this is a backend route, will add util tests

Request review criteria:

Self checklist (all need to be checked):

• The developer has manually tested the changes and verified that the changes work
• Commits have been squashed into descriptive, self-contained units of work (e.g. 'WIP' and 'Implements feedback' style messages have been removed)
• Testing instructions have been added in the PR body (for PRs involving changes that are not immediately obvious).
• The developer has added tests or explained why testing cannot be added (unit or cypress tests for related changes)

If you have UI changes:

• Included any necessary screenshots or gifs if it was a UI change.
• Included tags to the UX team if it was a UI/UX change (find relevant UX in the SMEs section).

After the PR is posted & before it merges:

• The developer has tested their solution on a cluster by using the image produced by the PR to main

cc @yannnz

[Gkrumbach07]

keeping this as WIP until security review is done. I will also add tests in the meantime

[Gkrumbach07]

/retest

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 65.21739% with 72 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 78.75%. Comparing base (f7c9979) to head (c5ecff0).
Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2827      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   78.83%   78.75%   -0.09%     
==========================================
  Files        1113     1116       +3     
  Lines       23586    23717     +131     
  Branches     5940     5972      +32     
==========================================
+ Hits        18595    18679      +84     
- Misses       4991     5038      +47     

Files	Coverage Δ
frontend/src/concepts/areas/const.ts	100.00% <ø> (ø)
frontend/src/concepts/areas/types.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...pelines/apiHooks/mlmd/useGetEventsByExecutionId.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (+6.25%)	⬆️
.../src/concepts/pipelines/content/artifacts/utils.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...eRuns/metricsSection/PipelineRunArtifactSelect.tsx	2.77% <ø> (ø)
.../pipelinesDetails/pipeline/PipelineTaskDetails.tsx	76.19% <ø> (+2.27%)	⬆️
...ipelinesDetails/pipelineRun/PipelineRunDetails.tsx	81.25% <100.00%> (-0.29%)	⬇️
...Details/pipelineRun/SelectedNodeInputOutputTab.tsx	93.33% <ø> (-0.22%)	⬇️
...ails/pipelineRun/artifacts/ArtifactNodeDetails.tsx	70.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...ipelineRun/artifacts/ArtifactNodeDrawerContent.tsx	70.58% <ø> (ø)
... and 15 more

... and 11 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f7c9979...c5ecff0. Read the comment docs.

[Gkrumbach07]

@andrewballantyne I took this out of WIP, the safety check for the storage status is used, and the feature flag blocks the endpoint

[andrewballantyne]

If you would like to talk about permission flows more, let me know

[Gkrumbach07]

/retest

[andrewballantyne]

Okay, let's go with this implementation. We'll be looking at replacing this logic with more structured backend soon, so this is temporary.

We need loading spinners for the artifact peek loading & we definitely need to consider why the Artifact page does not have the peek -- it's awkward that the direct source (the artifact page itself) of the data doesn't have it but the embedded sources (on the runs page) do...

/hold

Not sure if you're addressing the loading spinners now or later, unhold it if you'll follow up in another PR.

[andrewballantyne]

lgtm

/unhold

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: andrewballantyne

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [andrewballantyne]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment