[RHOAIENG-4999] Details page for archived runs

[jenny-s51]

Closes https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-4999

Description

• Adds a label indicating the run is archived in the run title (see mocks)
• Adds dropdown actions for an archived run

How Has This Been Tested?

1. Experiments and Runs
2. Select a run
3. Toggle dropdown in upper right
4. Test that dropdown actions are in parity with the mocks and the methods work as expected.

Test Impact

Updated PipelinesTopology.cy.ts.

Request review criteria:

Self checklist (all need to be checked):

• The developer has manually tested the changes and verified that the changes work
• Commits have been squashed into descriptive, self-contained units of work (e.g. 'WIP' and 'Implements feedback' style messages have been removed)
• Testing instructions have been added in the PR body (for PRs involving changes that are not immediately obvious).
• The developer has added tests or explained why testing cannot be added (unit or cypress tests for related changes)

If you have UI changes:

• Included any necessary screenshots or gifs if it was a UI change.
• Included tags to the UX team if it was a UI/UX change (find relevant UX in the SMEs section).

After the PR is posted & before it merges:

• The developer has tested their solution on a cluster by using the image produced by the PR to main

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 50.00000% with 21 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 77.43%. Comparing base (c9caed3) to head (ede387d).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2833      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   77.48%   77.43%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files        1110     1110              
  Lines       23482    23515      +33     
  Branches     5917     5932      +15     
==========================================
+ Hits        18196    18210      +14     
- Misses       5286     5305      +19     

Files	Coverage Δ
...s/content/tables/experiment/ExperimentTableRow.tsx	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
.../concepts/pipelines/context/usePipelineAPIState.ts	83.33% <ø> (ø)
frontend/src/api/pipelines/custom.ts	97.46% <50.00%> (-1.24%)	⬇️
.../content/pipelinesDetails/PipelineDetailsTitle.tsx	92.85% <66.66%> (-7.15%)	⬇️
...ipelinesDetails/pipelineRun/PipelineRunDetails.tsx	81.53% <40.00%> (-2.07%)	⬇️
...sDetails/pipelineRun/PipelineRunDetailsActions.tsx	55.31% <46.66%> (-12.69%)	⬇️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c9caed3...ede387d. Read the comment docs.

[jpuzz0]

"Clone" vs "Duplicate" was discussed here a few months ago. Unless something has changed, I believe the intention was to keep the "Duplicate" wording.

[jenny-s51]

Thank you for providing clarity on this @jpuzz0 - based on that discussion it looks like the mocks are out of date, will revert back to Duplicate. cc @yannnz @xianli123

[jenny-s51]

Following the conversation in the demo of this work during the Pipelines Review meeting this morning, based on feedback from @yannnz we want to disable the Restore button on Archived runs, and add a tooltip as shown below.

It was also noted by Fede that, when navigating to an archived experiment from "Experiments and Runs", we want to set the Archived tab as the active tab:

[Gkrumbach07]

Need to verify this

An active run cannot be deleted. Should remove the Delete action in the Action dropdown.
Miss Retry action.

[Gkrumbach07]

/lgtm
/approve

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Gkrumbach07

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• frontend/OWNERS [Gkrumbach07]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[Gkrumbach07]

/lgtm