Convert templates to use websocket

[ppadti]

Closes: RHOAIENG-5368

Description

Convert templates to use websockets. Replaces templates#listTemplates with useTemplates.
Created hook useCustomK8sWatchResource to perform type check on errors.

How Has This Been Tested?

In settings, open serving runtimes:

1. Add/Edit/Duplicate/Delete the serving runtimes and check network inspector for websocket connection.

Test Impact

Added unit test to the useCustomK8sWatchResource hook.
Updated unit and cypress test to use websocket.

Request review criteria:

Self checklist (all need to be checked):

• The developer has manually tested the changes and verified that the changes work
• Commits have been squashed into descriptive, self-contained units of work (e.g. 'WIP' and 'Implements feedback' style messages have been removed)
• Testing instructions have been added in the PR body (for PRs involving changes that are not immediately obvious).
• The developer has added tests or explained why testing cannot be added (unit or cypress tests for related changes)

If you have UI changes:

• Included any necessary screenshots or gifs if it was a UI change.
• Included tags to the UX team if it was a UI/UX change (find relevant UX in the SMEs section).

After the PR is posted & before it merges:

• The developer has tested their solution on a cluster by using the image produced by the PR to main

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 94.64286% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 78.49%. Comparing base (b33db83) to head (c43dfcd).
Report is 62 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2855      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   78.16%   78.49%   +0.33%     
==========================================
  Files        1101     1127      +26     
  Lines       23421    23944     +523     
  Branches     5902     6042     +140     
==========================================
+ Hits        18307    18795     +488     
- Misses       5114     5149      +35     

Files	Coverage Δ
frontend/src/api/k8s/groups.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
frontend/src/api/k8s/projects.ts	97.43% <100.00%> (ø)
frontend/src/api/k8s/templates.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
frontend/src/concepts/projects/ProjectsContext.tsx	87.75% <100.00%> (-0.25%)	⬇️
...rvingRuntimes/CustomServingRuntimeEditTemplate.tsx	76.92% <100.00%> (-6.42%)	⬇️
...vingRuntimes/CustomServingRuntimeEnabledToggle.tsx	58.06% <100.00%> (ø)
...omServingRuntimes/CustomServingRuntimeListView.tsx	84.61% <100.00%> (ø)
...customServingRuntimes/CustomServingRuntimeView.tsx	75.00% <100.00%> (-25.00%)	⬇️
...ervingRuntimes/DeleteCustomServingRuntimeModal.tsx	83.87% <100.00%> (ø)
...s/modelServing/screens/global/ServeModelButton.tsx	94.59% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 11 more

... and 117 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b33db83...c43dfcd. Read the comment docs.

[ppadti]

@christianvogt I tried sending resource to websocket while editing serving templates in cypress test it doesn't seems to work. But I am unsure what should be the modelOrOption while sending Patch request.
This is what I tried for editing serving runtime:

cy.wsK8s(
     'MODIFIED',
     TemplateModel,
incrementResourceVersion(
     mockServingRuntimeTemplateK8sResource({
       name: 'template-1',
       displayName: 'Updated Multi platform',
       platforms: [ServingRuntimePlatform.SINGLE],
     }),)
   );

[ppadti]

Updated the PR.

[christianvogt]

/lgtm
/approve

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: christianvogt

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• frontend/OWNERS [christianvogt]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment