Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: pvc fixes #3296

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 7, 2024
Merged

fix: pvc fixes #3296

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 7, 2024

Conversation

olavtar
Copy link
Contributor

@olavtar olavtar commented Oct 3, 2024

Description

PVC Name update in the servingRuntime fixes

How Has This Been Tested?

Tested locally

Test Impact

Tested both fast and slow deletion, followed by model recreation.

Request review criteria:

Self checklist (all need to be checked):

  • The developer has manually tested the changes and verified that the changes work
  • Testing instructions have been added in the PR body (for PRs involving changes that are not immediately obvious).
  • The developer has added tests or explained why testing cannot be added (unit or cypress tests for related changes)

If you have UI changes:

  • Included any necessary screenshots or gifs if it was a UI change.
  • Included tags to the UX team if it was a UI/UX change.

After the PR is posted & before it merges:

  • The developer has tested their solution on a cluster by using the image produced by the PR to main

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress This PR is in WIP state needs-ok-to-test The openshift bot needs to label PRs from non members to avoid strain on the CI labels Oct 3, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 3, 2024

Hi @olavtar. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a opendatahub-io member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 3, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 75.86207% with 7 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 84.79%. Comparing base (215d63d) to head (3676b10).
Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...projects/NIMServiceModal/DeployNIMServiceModal.tsx 0.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
...rc/pages/modelServing/screens/projects/nimUtils.ts 86.95% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3296      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   84.78%   84.79%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1308     1308              
  Lines       29247    29256       +9     
  Branches     7936     7937       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits        24796    24809      +13     
+ Misses       4451     4447       -4     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
frontend/src/api/k8s/servingRuntimes.ts 98.93% <100.00%> (+4.54%) ⬆️
...s/projects/NIMServiceModal/NIMModelListSection.tsx 1.66% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
...d/src/pages/modelServing/screens/projects/utils.ts 97.27% <100.00%> (ø)
...rc/pages/modelServing/screens/projects/nimUtils.ts 57.81% <86.95%> (+5.53%) ⬆️
...projects/NIMServiceModal/DeployNIMServiceModal.tsx 4.80% <0.00%> (-0.15%) ⬇️

... and 4 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 215d63d...3676b10. Read the comment docs.

@olavtar olavtar marked this pull request as ready for review October 4, 2024 01:58
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress This PR is in WIP state label Oct 4, 2024
@andrewballantyne
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added ok-to-test The openshift bot needs `ok-to-test` to allow non member PRs to run the tests. and removed needs-ok-to-test The openshift bot needs to label PRs from non members to avoid strain on the CI labels Oct 4, 2024
Signed-off-by: Olga Lavtar <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Oct 7, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 7, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: andrewballantyne

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved label Oct 7, 2024
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 82d4f12 into opendatahub-io:main Oct 7, 2024
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved lgtm ok-to-test The openshift bot needs `ok-to-test` to allow non member PRs to run the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants