Support for Trusty DB fields

[andrewballantyne]

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-13084

Description

Refactored Trusty state as we are getting better status information.

Added DB modal. Screenshots below.

Screenshots

How Has This Been Tested?

• Install Trusty in the DSC

  • trustyai:
      devFlags:
        manifests:
          - contextDir: config
            sourcePath: ''
            uri: https://api.github.com/repos/ruivieira/trustyai-service-operator/tarball/RHOAIENG-14041-db-status-dev
    

• Make sure our flag is enabled (may need to use the ?devFeatureFlags param if you're on a cluster that is disabling trusty for RHOAI)

Deploy a DB & connect to it via the Trusty settings in the Project Settings tab.
Steps for mariadb: https://github.com/trustyai-explainability/reference/blob/main/db-connection/README.md

Test Impact

Modal & button state tests -- dropped old checkbox tests (component was removed)

Request review criteria:

Self checklist (all need to be checked):

• The developer has manually tested the changes and verified that the changes work
• Testing instructions have been added in the PR body (for PRs involving changes that are not immediately obvious).
• The developer has added tests or explained why testing cannot be added (unit or cypress tests for related changes)

If you have UI changes:

• Included any necessary screenshots or gifs if it was a UI change.
• Included tags to the UX team if it was a UI/UX change.

After the PR is posted & before it merges:

• The developer has tested their solution on a cluster by using the image produced by the PR to main

[andrewballantyne]

Contextual review comments

[Gkrumbach07]

Ok I looked over the code and other than what i commented it looks alright. Going to test it live

update: tested live and it is looking good.

[Gkrumbach07]

code looks good and works on cluster live. a few things to follow up on after

• if the secret is valid then it will recheck on blur even if no text change
• you are allowed to submit a secret name such as "my-secret ". input says its valid but trusty may or may not think so?
  /lgtm

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Gkrumbach07

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• frontend/OWNERS [Gkrumbach07]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 78.15700% with 64 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 84.81%. Comparing base (c4e2940) to head (5acc212).
Report is 21 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
frontend/src/concepts/trustyai/utils.ts	60.60%	13 Missing ⚠️
...ncepts/trustyai/content/useTrustyBrowserStorage.ts	52.63%	9 Missing ⚠️
...pts/trustyai/content/useTrustyInstallModalData.tsx	84.61%	8 Missing ⚠️
...ntend/src/concepts/trustyai/useManageTrustyAICR.ts	63.63%	8 Missing ⚠️
...c/concepts/trustyai/content/InstallTrustyModal.tsx	78.78%	7 Missing ⚠️
...concepts/trustyai/content/TrustyDBSecretFields.tsx	22.22%	7 Missing ⚠️
...src/concepts/trustyai/content/useTrustyCRState.tsx	80.64%	6 Missing ⚠️
...s/trustyai/content/TrustyDBExistingSecretField.tsx	87.09%	4 Missing ⚠️
frontend/src/concepts/k8s/utils.ts	66.66%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3305      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   84.74%   84.81%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files        1308     1315       +7     
  Lines       29242    29517     +275     
  Branches     7936     8060     +124     
==========================================
+ Hits        24781    25034     +253     
- Misses       4461     4483      +22     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
frontend/src/api/trustyai/k8s.ts	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...rontend/src/components/FieldGroupHelpLabelIcon.tsx	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...src/concepts/k8s/ResourceNameDefinitionTooltip.tsx	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
frontend/src/concepts/trustyai/const.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...ai/content/statusStates/TrustyAIInstalledState.tsx	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
.../content/statusStates/TrustyAIUninstalledState.tsx	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
.../src/concepts/trustyai/context/TrustyAIContext.tsx	100.00% <100.00%> (+4.34%)	⬆️
...oncepts/trustyai/context/useDoesTrustyAICRExist.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
.../src/concepts/trustyai/context/useModelBiasData.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
frontend/src/concepts/trustyai/types.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 17 more

... and 98 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c4e2940...5acc212. Read the comment docs.