Include missing parameters for new lines #123
Conversation
| @@ -113,15 +118,26 @@ def add_line(x0, y0, x1, y1, v_nom, scn_name, cables): | |||
| if v_nom == 220: | |||
| s_nom = 520 | |||
| x_per_km = 0.001 * 2 * np.pi * 50 | |||
| r_per_km = 0.097 # based on average r from similar lines | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
But actually if it is a length-specific value and only for a 220kV overhead line, all of the lines of this type should have the same value, right? So if you take average should be the same as taking any value of this group? So value-wise it should not make a difference, I guess. It just reads a bit like as it would be just a rough estimate...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I also thought that all the lines with the same capacity and voltage level should have the same resistance/km but it is not the case. I will proceed to write a more generic calculation using the values here.
| @@ -113,15 +118,26 @@ def add_line(x0, y0, x1, y1, v_nom, scn_name, cables): | |||
| if v_nom == 220: | |||
| s_nom = 520 | |||
| x_per_km = 0.001 * 2 * np.pi * 50 | |||
| r_per_km = 0.097 # based on average r from similar lines | |||
| b_per_km = 3.066e-6 # based on average b from similar lines | |||
| cost_km = 40.697 # based on average costs from similar lines | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I am not quite sure where it is normally set. But also here should be somewhere a value or calculation which could be directly used.
|
@ulfmueller I think now it is worth checking this PR again. |
Fixes #120.
Already tested on the server.