-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for invoking with context. #25
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should the context really be sent back with the Response? How would that be used? Do you envision it behaving like the
http.Response
object with its ownr.Context()
? I wonder if that is actually recommended, I think thehttp.Response
object has an embedded context because they didn't want to change thehttp.Handler
interfaceThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @LucasRoesler, thank you for reviewing.
I believe so.
I've provided an example above.
I don't think I quite understand what you are referring to, but the way I envision this context to work is as a something that groups together contextual information that can be used to correlate responses with the original request as detailed above.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have thought more about this and I don't see an alternative approach. Adding the context here seems to make sense to me
Also, I realize that I have a typo in my original comment, I meant
http.Request
, nothttp.Response
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A custom string, or a map could be used instead of the context.
My fear is that people will expect the context to be used as something more than the intent Bruno is proposing (as a map/bag).
The context object also has timeout / duration / cancellation / done behaviour, but this behaviour hasn't been implemented in the PR.
Would a map of
string[string]
be sufficient for what you need Bruno, or a string of some sort?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Lucas has just pointed me at this line -> https://github.com/openfaas-incubator/connector-sdk/pull/25/files#diff-cd0839c41d9c260fb20a0c53fe284e3eR86
If this context is being used for more than just a bag for a request / message ID and is fully functional as a Context, I think Lucas + I are in agreement with moving the change forward with #28 raised to cover my other concerns.