-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
8362282: runtime/logging/StressAsyncUL.java failed with exitValue = 134 #27169
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
👋 Welcome back cnorrbin! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@caspernorrbin This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 20 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
@caspernorrbin The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fix looks good. One minor nit. Thanks.
// We use LogOutputList's RCU counters to ensure all synchronous logsites have completed. | ||
// After that, we start AsyncLog Thread and it exclusively takes over all logging I/O. | ||
// After that, we publish the initalized _instance to readers. | ||
// Then, start the AsyncLog Thread; It exclusively takes over all logging I/O. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
// Then, start the AsyncLog Thread; It exclusively takes over all logging I/O. | |
// Then we start the AsyncLog Thread and it exclusively takes over all logging I/O. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changed wording to this in 8e42198.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems correct
Thank you for the quick reviews! /integrate |
Going to push as commit c968a67.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@caspernorrbin Pushed as commit c968a67. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Hi everyone,
During
AsyncLogWriter
initialization we previously published the globalAsyncLogWriter _instance
before waiting for existing synchronous logging activity to finish and before starting the async consumer thread. As soon as_instance
became visible,is_enqueue_allowed()
allowed new log calls to switch to the async path. Those calls bumpedLogOutputList
's counters whileinitialize()
was waiting forwait_until_no_readers()
to observe no active readers. At the same time, because the consumer thread wasn’t yet running, producers could end up waiting for a consumer that didn’t exist. In rare timing, this created a circular wait that manifested as intermittent lock-ups inStressAsyncUL.java
.The initialization order is changed so that we do not make the async writer visible until after all pre-existing synchronous logging has completed. Concretely,
initialize()
now:LogTagSet
to report no readers, ensuring synchronous logging is done,_instance
with a release store so readers observe a fully initialized writer, andWith this ordering, new async producers cannot keep the counters inflated while initialization is waiting. Any messages produced in the brief window between publishing
_instance
and the thread's first run are safely buffered and then consumed as soon as the thread starts.Testing:
StressAsyncUL.java
with no observed lock-upsProgress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27169/head:pull/27169
$ git checkout pull/27169
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/27169
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27169/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 27169
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 27169
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27169.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment