Skip to content

Conversation

caspernorrbin
Copy link
Member

@caspernorrbin caspernorrbin commented Sep 9, 2025

Hi everyone,

During AsyncLogWriter initialization we previously published the global AsyncLogWriter _instance before waiting for existing synchronous logging activity to finish and before starting the async consumer thread. As soon as _instance became visible, is_enqueue_allowed() allowed new log calls to switch to the async path. Those calls bumped LogOutputList's counters while initialize() was waiting for wait_until_no_readers() to observe no active readers. At the same time, because the consumer thread wasn’t yet running, producers could end up waiting for a consumer that didn’t exist. In rare timing, this created a circular wait that manifested as intermittent lock-ups in StressAsyncUL.java.

The initialization order is changed so that we do not make the async writer visible until after all pre-existing synchronous logging has completed. Concretely, initialize() now:

  1. waits for each LogTagSet to report no readers, ensuring synchronous logging is done,
  2. publishes _instance with a release store so readers observe a fully initialized writer, and
  3. immediately starts the async logging thread.

With this ordering, new async producers cannot keep the counters inflated while initialization is waiting. Any messages produced in the brief window between publishing _instance and the thread's first run are safely buffered and then consumed as soon as the thread starts.

Testing:

  • Oracle tiers 1-3
  • Repeated runs of StressAsyncUL.java with no observed lock-ups

Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8362282: runtime/logging/StressAsyncUL.java failed with exitValue = 134 (Bug - P3)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27169/head:pull/27169
$ git checkout pull/27169

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/27169
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27169/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 27169

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 27169

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27169.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 9, 2025

👋 Welcome back cnorrbin! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 9, 2025

@caspernorrbin This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8362282: runtime/logging/StressAsyncUL.java failed with exitValue = 134

Reviewed-by: jsjolen, dholmes

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 20 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 9, 2025

@caspernorrbin The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-runtime

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added hotspot-runtime [email protected] rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Sep 9, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Sep 9, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@dholmes-ora dholmes-ora left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fix looks good. One minor nit. Thanks.

// We use LogOutputList's RCU counters to ensure all synchronous logsites have completed.
// After that, we start AsyncLog Thread and it exclusively takes over all logging I/O.
// After that, we publish the initalized _instance to readers.
// Then, start the AsyncLog Thread; It exclusively takes over all logging I/O.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
// Then, start the AsyncLog Thread; It exclusively takes over all logging I/O.
// Then we start the AsyncLog Thread and it exclusively takes over all logging I/O.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changed wording to this in 8e42198.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 10, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@jdksjolen jdksjolen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems correct

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 10, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 10, 2025
@caspernorrbin
Copy link
Member Author

Thank you for the quick reviews!

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 10, 2025

Going to push as commit c968a67.
Since your change was applied there have been 29 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Sep 10, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Sep 10, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Sep 10, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 10, 2025

@caspernorrbin Pushed as commit c968a67.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-runtime [email protected] integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants