-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
8367902: Allocation after Universe::before_exit() in the VM shutdown sequence #28227
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back lmesnik! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@lmesnik This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 47 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
|
@lmesnik The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
|
/cc hotspot-gc |
|
@lmesnik |
Webrevs
|
Is there a reason why (The current patch would leave GC running while calling |
|
I agree with Albert. I would prefer a patch that moves the JVMTI code instead. This is also what I've tested through tier1-8 in my queue of patches to clean up some of the shutdown code: |
|
@lmesnik |
I updated to move jvmti code. Seems that following opertaions |
stefank
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good and thanks for the test!
xmas92
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm.
sspitsyn
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good. Thank you for fixing this issue!
|
/integrate |
|
Going to push as commit 705bd6f.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
Please review following fix that move GC shutdown start after VM Death and agent's unloading.
The
Universe::before_exit();switch GC to fail any new GC allocation. So any allocation in vm death is failing.The test is a little bit complicated because jtreg uses wrapper even to execute othrevm tests and also results might be confusing if test is failing after main() method is completed. So the better is to run new process for vm death event handling.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28227/head:pull/28227$ git checkout pull/28227Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/28227$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28227/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 28227View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 28227Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28227.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment