Add Benchmarking Config for Faiss SQfp16

[naveentatikonda]

Description

Add configuration to run benchmarking test for Faiss SQfp16.

Check List

• Commits are signed as per the DCO using --signoff

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.96%. Comparing base (e8c9ced) to head (cea09f1).

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #1575      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     85.15%   84.96%   -0.20%     
+ Complexity     1371     1366       -5     
============================================
  Files           172      172              
  Lines          5566     5566              
  Branches        546      546              
============================================
- Hits           4740     4729      -11     
- Misses          596      605       +9     
- Partials        230      232       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[navneet1v]

@naveentatikonda Lets not add the SQ benchmarks in perf tool and instead put this in OSB. We have migrated our benchmarks to OSB repo. Lets use that repo to add new benchmarks.

cc: @vamshin

[naveentatikonda]

@naveentatikonda Lets not add the SQ benchmarks in perf tool and instead put this in OSB. We have migrated our benchmarks to OSB repo. Lets use that repo to add new benchmarks.

cc: @vamshin

Sure I will add it in OSB-workloads. But, shall we also add it here just in case if we want to run tests using perf-tool. Also, if I'm not wrong as of now the OSB supports vector search with no train procedure only.

[navneet1v]

@naveentatikonda Lets not add the SQ benchmarks in perf tool and instead put this in OSB. We have migrated our benchmarks to OSB repo. Lets use that repo to add new benchmarks.
cc: @vamshin

Sure I will add it in OSB-workloads. But, shall we also add it here just in case if we want to run tests using perf-tool. Also, if I'm not wrong as of now the OSB supports vector search with no train procedure only.

Yes it supports only no-train procedures. But SQFp-16 is no train workload right. So we should be able to support it with OSB.

[navneet1v]

But, shall we also add it here just in case if we want to run tests using perf-tool.

I would not recommend.

[naveentatikonda]

@naveentatikonda Lets not add the SQ benchmarks in perf tool and instead put this in OSB. We have migrated our benchmarks to OSB repo. Lets use that repo to add new benchmarks.
cc: @vamshin

Sure I will add it in OSB-workloads. But, shall we also add it here just in case if we want to run tests using perf-tool. Also, if I'm not wrong as of now the OSB supports vector search with no train procedure only.

Yes it supports only no-train procedures. But SQFp-16 is no train workload right. So we should be able to support it with OSB.

We don't need training for hnsw. But, for ivf we need training. But, that makes sense that we want to migrate to OSB-workloads. Will add it there. Thanks!