Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DRAFT] [Feature] Introduces resource sharing and access-control #4746

Draft
wants to merge 16 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

DarshitChanpura
Copy link
Member

@DarshitChanpura DarshitChanpura commented Sep 22, 2024

companion PR: opensearch-project/OpenSearch#16030

Description

Introduces a new authorization mechanism to control access to resources defined by plugins.

This PR also introduces a sample resource plugin to show the APIs in action.

  • Category : New feature
  • Why these changes are required?
    • At present, plugins have implemented in-house authorization mechanisms for a lack of centralized framework. This PR introduces a centralized way to offload resource permissions check to security plugin. Plugins will leverage the java APIs introduced in core.

Issues Resolved

Testing

  • automated and manual testing

Check List

  • New functionality includes testing
  • New functionality has been documented
  • New Roles/Permissions have a corresponding security dashboards plugin PR
  • API changes companion pull request created
  • Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

return services;
}

public static class GuiceHolder implements LifecycleComponent {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This GuiceHolder pattern from the security plugin is IMHO only a hack to get access to dependencies which are available via dependency injection, but not via the createComponents() API in the Plugin interface. The un-hackish way to give plugins access to ResourceService would be to add it to the param list of createComponents().

@DarshitChanpura
Copy link
Member Author

DarshitChanpura commented Oct 4, 2024

Resource-sharing index gets created successfully upon first cluster start:

[2024-10-04T14:09:04,570][INFO ][o.o.p.PluginsService     ] [80a9970ace0f] PluginService:onIndexModule index:[.opensearch_resource_sharing/G4yJ1aVmRRaQStn45aWdDg]
[2024-10-04T14:09:04,604][INFO ][o.o.c.m.MetadataCreateIndexService] [80a9970ace0f] [.opensearch_resource_sharing] creating index, cause [api], templates [], shards [1]/[1]
[2024-10-04T14:09:04,607][INFO ][o.o.c.r.a.AllocationService] [80a9970ace0f] updating number_of_replicas to [0] for indices [.opensearch_resource_sharing]
[2024-10-04T14:09:04,608][WARN ][o.o.c.r.a.AllocationService] [80a9970ace0f] Falling back to single shard assignment since batch mode disable or multiple custom allocators set
[2024-10-04T14:09:04,638][INFO ][o.o.p.PluginsService     ] [80a9970ace0f] PluginService:onIndexModule index:[.opensearch_resource_sharing/G4yJ1aVmRRaQStn45aWdDg]
[2024-10-04T14:09:04,748][INFO ][o.o.c.r.a.AllocationService] [80a9970ace0f] Cluster health status changed from [YELLOW] to [GREEN] (reason: [shards started [[.opensearch_resource_sharing][0]]]).
[2024-10-04T14:09:04,768][INFO ][o.o.s.r.ResourceSharingIndexHandler] [80a9970ace0f] Resource sharing index .opensearch_resource_sharing created.

and subsequent starts show that the index is present:

[2024-10-04T14:11:08,755][INFO ][o.o.s.r.ResourceSharingIndexHandler] [80a9970ace0f] Index .opensearch_resource_sharing already exists.

Sample Resource Plugin loaded successfully:

[2024-10-04T14:49:06,630][INFO ][o.o.s.s.SampleResourcePlugin] [80a9970ace0f] Loaded SampleResourcePlugin components.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants