maintenance: fix the linter complains

[kpouget]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Refactor

  • Standardized UTC timestamp handling across job tracking, scheduling, and Kubernetes operations.
  • Improved code formatting, import organization, and internal readability without changing existing behavior.
  • Clarified logging and configuration code presentation while preserving current settings and messages.

• API

  • Added reconcile_stopping to the publicly exported handler functions.

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign kpouget for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@kpouget, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 48 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 59fbbff9-6f76-4996-ac86-8357e5e19864

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e92b911 and b678fc9.

📒 Files selected for processing (8)

• hacks/sync_vault_secrets.py
• pyproject.toml
• tests/conftest.py
• tests/forge/deploy/orchestration/ci.py
• tests/forge/deploy/orchestration/cli.py
• tests/forge/deploy/orchestration/deploy.py
• tests/forge/deploy/orchestration/utils.py
• tests/test_exclusive.py

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 77.78% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title matches the maintenance-focused lint/formatting cleanup in this PR, though the wording is a bit unpolished.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 2

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@fournos-ui/app/main.py`:
- Around line 783-790: Update the replacement flow around
k8s_client.delete_cronjob so a deletion failure is not swallowed or treated as
success. When deleting edit_target raises, delete the newly created CronJob as
compensation, then re-raise or otherwise propagate the failure so the UI does
not redirect as though replacement succeeded.

In `@fournos/__main__.py`:
- Line 22: Update the module-level import of main from kopf.cli in
fournos.__main__ so it occurs before any executable runtime code, or restore the
file’s targeted E402 suppression. Ensure plain Ruff checks for fournos/ and
tests/ pass without changing the module’s behavior.

🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

• Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
• Create a new PR with the fixes

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: b300c937-deeb-4450-83a4-47f6b9bf8253

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1f27f6c and e92b911.

📒 Files selected for processing (17)

• fournos-ui/app/config.py
• fournos-ui/app/db.py
• fournos-ui/app/forge_discovery.py
• fournos-ui/app/k8s_client.py
• fournos-ui/app/main.py
• fournos-ui/app/watcher.py
• fournos/__init__.py
• fournos/__main__.py
• fournos/handlers/__init__.py
• fournos/handlers/lifecycle.py
• fournos/handlers/status.py
• fournos/operator.py
• hacks/sync_vault_secrets.py
• tests/forge/deploy/orchestration/ci.py
• tests/forge/deploy/orchestration/cli.py
• tests/forge/deploy/orchestration/deploy.py
• tests/forge/deploy/orchestration/utils.py

[kpouget]

all the tests are green, merging 👍🏻