No-JIRA: yaml was not rendering correctly #401
Conversation
|
@miyadav: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
jira/valid-reference
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
WalkthroughThe description field of the thinker agent in Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
Knowledge base: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.claude/agents/feedback.md(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.claude/agents/feedback.md (1)
1-23: YAML frontmatter is valid—no changes required.The YAML literal block scalar parses correctly with proper indentation and successfully handles the embedded XML-like tags. The frontmatter structure is valid and all fields are correctly interpreted.
| description: | | ||
| Use this agent when you need expert feedback on your plans, code changes, reviews, or problem-solving approach. | ||
| This agent should be used proactively during development work to validate your thinking and discover blind spots. | ||
| Examples: | ||
| <example> | ||
| Context: User is working on a complex refactoring task and has outlined their approach. | ||
| user: 'I am planning to refactor the authentication system by moving from JWT to session-based auth. Here is my plan: [detailed plan]' | ||
| assistant: 'Let me use the gemini-consultant agent to get expert feedback on this refactoring plan before we proceed.' | ||
| <commentary>Since the user has outlined a significant architectural change, use the gemini-consultant agent to validate the approach and identify potential issues.</commentary> | ||
| </example> | ||
| <example> | ||
| Context: User has implemented a new feature and wants to ensure it is robust. | ||
| user: 'I have implemented the new caching layer. Here is what I did: [implementation details]' | ||
| assistant: 'Now let me consult with gemini to review this implementation and see if there are any improvements or issues I should address.' | ||
| <commentary>After completing implementation work, use the gemini-consultant agent to get expert review and suggestions for improvement.</commentary> | ||
| </example> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Address agent naming inconsistency in examples.
Lines 12 and 19 reference a "gemini-consultant agent", but the instructions on line 34 use just "gemini" as the command name. This discrepancy may cause confusion or execution errors when users follow the examples.
Clarify whether the agent should be named gemini, gemini-consultant, or similar. Update lines 12 and 19 to match the actual command name used in the shell instructions (line 34):
- assistant: 'Let me use the gemini-consultant agent to get expert feedback on this refactoring plan before we proceed.'
+ assistant: 'Let me consult with gemini to get expert feedback on this refactoring plan before we proceed.'- assistant: 'Now let me consult with gemini to review this implementation and see if there are any improvements or issues I should address.'
+ assistant: 'Now let me consult with gemini to review this implementation and see if there are any improvements or issues I should address.'📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| description: | | |
| Use this agent when you need expert feedback on your plans, code changes, reviews, or problem-solving approach. | |
| This agent should be used proactively during development work to validate your thinking and discover blind spots. | |
| Examples: | |
| <example> | |
| Context: User is working on a complex refactoring task and has outlined their approach. | |
| user: 'I am planning to refactor the authentication system by moving from JWT to session-based auth. Here is my plan: [detailed plan]' | |
| assistant: 'Let me use the gemini-consultant agent to get expert feedback on this refactoring plan before we proceed.' | |
| <commentary>Since the user has outlined a significant architectural change, use the gemini-consultant agent to validate the approach and identify potential issues.</commentary> | |
| </example> | |
| <example> | |
| Context: User has implemented a new feature and wants to ensure it is robust. | |
| user: 'I have implemented the new caching layer. Here is what I did: [implementation details]' | |
| assistant: 'Now let me consult with gemini to review this implementation and see if there are any improvements or issues I should address.' | |
| <commentary>After completing implementation work, use the gemini-consultant agent to get expert review and suggestions for improvement.</commentary> | |
| </example> | |
| description: | | |
| Use this agent when you need expert feedback on your plans, code changes, reviews, or problem-solving approach. | |
| This agent should be used proactively during development work to validate your thinking and discover blind spots. | |
| Examples: | |
| <example> | |
| Context: User is working on a complex refactoring task and has outlined their approach. | |
| user: 'I am planning to refactor the authentication system by moving from JWT to session-based auth. Here is my plan: [detailed plan]' | |
| assistant: 'Let me consult with gemini to get expert feedback on this refactoring plan before we proceed.' | |
| <commentary>Since the user has outlined a significant architectural change, use the gemini-consultant agent to validate the approach and identify potential issues.</commentary> | |
| </example> | |
| <example> | |
| Context: User has implemented a new feature and wants to ensure it is robust. | |
| user: 'I have implemented the new caching layer. Here is what I did: [implementation details]' | |
| assistant: 'Now let me consult with gemini to review this implementation and see if there are any improvements or issues I should address.' | |
| <commentary>After completing implementation work, use the gemini-consultant agent to get expert review and suggestions for improvement.</commentary> | |
| </example> |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In .claude/agents/feedback.md around lines 3 to 21, there is a naming
inconsistency: lines 12 and 19 say "gemini-consultant agent" while the shell
instruction on line 34 uses "gemini". Pick the canonical command name (prefer
using "gemini" to match line 34) and update lines 12 and 19 to use that same
name (e.g., "gemini agent"); if you decide on a different canonical name
instead, update line 34 to match; ensure all examples and any brief commentary
reference the identical agent name.
|
@miyadav: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
This is really annoying, as you're right - yaml isn't rendering correctly. However, this is exactly what claude spits out and seems to give the best performance 🤣 |
|
/lgtm |
5 participants
@theobarberbany PTAL when time permits.
Summary by CodeRabbit