Skip to content

Conversation

@solenoci
Copy link

@solenoci solenoci commented Nov 11, 2025

Continuation of https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MON-3940.

Previous outdated PR: #2461

As the previous PR was stale and the person who created the PR is not longer working on it, I recreated the PR.

Any required changes will go into this PR.

Ref: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MTV-1370

  • I added CHANGELOG entry for this change.
  • No user facing changes, so no entry in CHANGELOG was needed.

Continuation of https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MON-3940.

Previous outdated PR: openshift#2461

As the previous PR was stale and the person who created the PR is not
longer working on it, I recreated the PR.

Ref: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MTV-1370

Signed-off-by: Stefan Olenocin <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Nov 11, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 11, 2025

@solenoci: This pull request references MON-3940 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Continuation of https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MON-3940.

Previous outdated PR: #2461

As the previous PR was stale and the person who created the PR is not longer working on it, I recreated the PR.

Ref: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MTV-1370

  • I added CHANGELOG entry for this change.
  • No user facing changes, so no entry in CHANGELOG was needed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Nov 11, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 11, 2025

Hi @solenoci. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a github.com member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 11, 2025

@solenoci: This pull request references MON-3940 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Continuation of https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MON-3940.

Previous outdated PR: #2461

As the previous PR was stale and the person who created the PR is not longer working on it, I recreated the PR.

Any required changes will go into this PR.

Ref: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MTV-1370

  • I added CHANGELOG entry for this change.
  • No user facing changes, so no entry in CHANGELOG was needed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

#
# cluster:mtv_migrations_status_total:max is the total number of VM migrations running on the cluster,
# labeled with {status}, {provider}, {mode}, and {target}.
- '{__name__="cluster:mtv_migrations_status_total:max"}'
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ideally we want to ensure that we only send metrics with known label values (I'm not sure about the possible values for the provider` label).

Suggested change
- '{__name__="cluster:mtv_migrations_status_total:max"}'
- '{__name__="cluster:mtv_migrations_status_total:max",provider=~"ova|vsphere|openstack|openshift|ovirt"},target=~"Local|Remote",mode=~"Cold|Warm",status=~"Succeeded|Failed|Canceled"'

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

They are corrrect

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

However we will add another provider soon, EC2

@solenoci
Copy link
Author

Added planned provider that we are actively working on, but do not have the metric yet, and RCM migration mode (same story) for which we will add the metric really soon.

Copy link
Contributor

@simonpasquier simonpasquier left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/hold for a final review by @janisz

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 12, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 12, 2025
@simonpasquier
Copy link
Contributor

/ok-to-test

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 12, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: simonpasquier, solenoci

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@simonpasquier
Copy link
Contributor

/cc @jan--f

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Nov 12, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from jan--f November 12, 2025 15:37
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Nov 12, 2025
@janisz
Copy link

janisz commented Nov 12, 2025

@simonpasquier Are you sure you'd like me to review? I think I miss the context

@simonpasquier
Copy link
Contributor

sorry @janisz that was a mistake!

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 13, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 13, 2025

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

# - target: "Local" or "Remote"
# - mode: "Cold", "Warm" or "RCM"
# - status: "Suceeded", "Failed" or "Canceled"
- '{__name__="cluster:mtv_migrations_status_total:max", provider=~"ova|vsphere|openstack|openshift|ovirt|awsec2", target=~"Local|Remote", mode=~"Cold|Warm|RCM", status=~"Succeeded|Failed|Canceled"}'
Copy link
Contributor

@juzhao juzhao Nov 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
- '{__name__="cluster:mtv_migrations_status_total:max", provider=~"ova|vsphere|openstack|openshift|ovirt|awsec2", target=~"Local|Remote", mode=~"Cold|Warm|RCM", status=~"Succeeded|Failed|Canceled"}'
- '{__name__="cluster:mtv_migrations_status_total:sum", provider=~"ova|vsphere|openstack|openshift|ovirt|awsec2", target=~"Local|Remote", mode=~"Cold|Warm|RCM", status=~"Succeeded|Failed|Canceled"}'

should change for all, replace all cluster:mtv_migrations_status_total:max to cluster:mtv_migrations_status_total:sum

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Right, sorry, changed for all.

Co-authored-by: Junqi Zhao <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 13, 2025

@solenoci: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/versions 3c7c43b link false /test versions
ci/prow/ginkgo-tests 3c7c43b link false /test ginkgo-tests
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn 3c7c43b link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview 3c7c43b link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview
ci/prow/generate 3c7c43b link true /test generate

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants