-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 240
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[release-4.16] OCPBUGS-43803: Start feature migration when the cluster CNI is changed to the target type #2552
base: release-4.16
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
@pliurh: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-43803, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/jira refresh |
@pliurh: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-43803, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
pre-merge tested this and all features looks good before the network type is changed to ovn /label qe-approved |
@pliurh: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-43803, which is valid. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@pliurh is this improvement specific to offline migration? Could you please add some context in the PR description about how is this helping reduce downtime? |
… type The first step in an offline migration is setting spec.migration.networkType, which triggers the cluster to update the MachineConfigPools. It also triggers feature migration, the egress IP previously assigned by the SDN will be released. At this stage, however, OVN-K is not yet deployed; the SDN continues to manage networking, allowing the egress IP functionality to remain operational. Therefore, we postpone the feature migration until after spec.default.type has been modified. It can help to reduce the downtime for egressIP during SDN migration. The impact for live migration is similar. Signed-off-by: Peng Liu <[email protected]>
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: pliurh The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
I was wrong, it can also help live migration. I updated the commit message, PTAL. |
@pliurh: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/retest-required |
The first step in an offline migration is settingspec.migration.networkType, which triggers the cluster to update the MachineConfigPools. It also triggers feature migration, the egress IP previously assigned by the SDN will be released. At this stage, however, OVN-K is not yet deployed; the SDN continues to manage networking, allowing the egress IP functionality to remain operational. Therefore, we postpone the feature migration until after spec.default.type has been
modified. It can help to reduce the downtime for egressIP during SDN migration. The impact for live migration is similar.