Skip to content

OCPBUGS-62095: CRI-O: set hard/soft file descriptor ulimits to 1048576 #5308

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: release-4.20
Choose a base branch
from
Open

OCPBUGS-62095: CRI-O: set hard/soft file descriptor ulimits to 1048576 #5308

wants to merge 1 commit into from
+9 −0

Conversation

saschagrunert
Copy link
Member

Change the default ulimits for CRI-O to resolve the mentioned issue in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-62095

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Sep 25, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@saschagrunert: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62095, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set
  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
  • expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62095 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.21.0 and in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Change the default ulimits for CRI-O to resolve the mentioned issue in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-62095

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@saschagrunert: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62095, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
  • expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62095 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.21.0 and in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from hasan4791 and mtrmac September 25, 2025 08:13
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 25, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@saschagrunert: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62095, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, POST, but it is MODIFIED instead
  • expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62095 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.21.0 and in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@saschagrunert: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62095, which is invalid:

  • expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62095 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.21.0 and in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@haircommander
Copy link
Member

/skip
/lgtm

In 4.21 we can address doing it the upstream way, but let's not create churn like that at this stage in the release

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 25, 2025
@openshift-ci OpenShift CI
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 25, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: haircommander, saschagrunert

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@haircommander
Copy link
Member

/retest

1 similar comment
@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@openshift-ci OpenShift CI
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 26, 2025 •
edited
Loading

@saschagrunert: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-mco-disruptive 3ed973f link false /test e2e-aws-mco-disruptive
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-op-single-node 3ed973f link true /test e2e-gcp-op-single-node
ci/prow/bootstrap-unit 3ed973f link false /test bootstrap-unit
ci/prow/e2e-agent-compact-ipv4 3ed973f link false /test e2e-agent-compact-ipv4
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-windows 3ed973f link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-windows
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-mco-disruptive 3ed973f link false /test e2e-gcp-mco-disruptive
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-op-ocl 3ed973f link false /test e2e-gcp-op-ocl
ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade-out-of-change 3ed973f link false /test e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade-out-of-change

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member Author

saschagrunert commented Sep 29, 2025 •
edited
Loading

@haircommander any hint how we can make the JIRA plugin happy?

@haircommander
Copy link
Member

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@haircommander: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62095, which is invalid:

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@haircommander
Copy link
Member

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Sep 29, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@haircommander: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62095, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.20.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.20.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note type set to "Release Note Not Required"
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62327 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED)
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62327 targets the "4.21.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.21.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @lyman9966

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from lyman9966 September 29, 2025 13:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@hasan4791 hasan4791 Awaiting requested review from hasan4791

@mtrmac mtrmac Awaiting requested review from mtrmac

@lyman9966 lyman9966 Awaiting requested review from lyman9966

Assignees

@haircommander haircommander

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@saschagrunert @openshift-ci-robot @haircommander