Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-4.16] OCPBUGS-41364: PTP events loses connectivity between producer and consumer when external interface is lost #532

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: release-4.16
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #528

/assign aneeshkp

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-39427 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-41364. Will retitle bug to link to clone.
/retitle [release-4.16] OCPBUGS-41364: PTP events loses connectivity between producer and consumer when external interface is lost

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #528

/assign aneeshkp

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title [release-4.16] OCPBUGS-39427: PTP events loses connectivity between producer and consumer when external interface is lost [release-4.16] OCPBUGS-41364: PTP events loses connectivity between producer and consumer when external interface is lost Sep 6, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Sep 6, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-41364, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-39427 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #528

/assign aneeshkp

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Sep 6, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 6, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: openshift-cherrypick-robot
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from aneeshkp. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 6, 2024

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@aneeshkp
Copy link
Contributor

/cherry-pick release-4.15

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Author

@aneeshkp: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.15 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.15

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@aneeshkp
Copy link
Contributor

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Sep 30, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@aneeshkp: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-41364, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.16.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.16.z)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note type set to "Release Note Not Required"
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-39427 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-39427 targets the "4.17.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.17.0
  • bug has dependents

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira ([email protected]), skipping review request.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants