fix: gencode element-plus test case #1074
Conversation
|
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 eslint
packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/element-plus-case.test.jsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 Error: Cannot read config file: /packages/vue-generator/.eslintrc.cjs
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces modifications to a Vue project's test environment and routing configuration. The changes include updating the test file to handle favicon mocking and file content writing, modifying the Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Test as Test Environment
participant Router as Vue Router
participant View as DemoPage View
Test->>Router: Initialize Routes
Router->>Router: Configure Root Path
Router->>Router: Add 'demopage' as Child Route
Router-->>View: Lazy Load DemoPage Component
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
github-actions
bot
added
bug
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/router/index.js (2)
3-8: Replace hardcoded route name with a meaningful constant.The route name '5bhD7p5FUsUOTFRN' appears to be a random string. Consider:
- Using a meaningful constant name
- Adding a comment explaining its purpose if this is a required format
+// Define route names as constants for better maintainability +const ROUTE_NAMES = { + DEMO_PAGE: '5bhD7p5FUsUOTFRN' +} const routes = [ { - name: '5bhD7p5FUsUOTFRN', + name: ROUTE_NAMES.DEMO_PAGE, path: 'demopage', component: () => import('@/views/DemoPage.vue'), children: [] } ]
13-13: Document the nested route structure.The change to nested routes is good for maintainability, but consider adding a comment explaining the routing hierarchy and its purpose.
+// Root route wraps all application routes to maintain consistent layout routes: [{ path: '/', children: routes }]packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/element-plus-case.test.js (2)
9-18: Consider extracting favicon mock to a separate helper file.The favicon mock improves test reliability but could be moved to a shared test helper for reuse across other test files.
Consider creating a new file
test/helpers/mockFavicon.js:import fs from 'fs' import path from 'path' export function mockFavicon(relativePath) { const fileBuffer = fs.readFileSync(path.join(__dirname, relativePath)) const str = fileBuffer.toString('base64') return { default: `data:image/x-icon;base64,${str}` } }
31-42: Consider extracting file writing logic to a utility function.The file content type checking and writing logic could be extracted to improve readability and reusability.
async function writeFileContent(filePath, fileName, fileContent) { const fullPath = path.resolve(__dirname, `./result/appdemo01/${filePath}/${fileName}`) if (typeof fileContent === 'string') { fs.writeFileSync(fullPath, fileContent.replace(/\r?\n/g, '\r\n')) } else if (fileContent instanceof Blob) { const arrayBuffer = await fileContent.arrayBuffer() const buffer = Buffer.from(arrayBuffer) fs.writeFileSync(fullPath, buffer) } else { throw new Error(`Unsupported file content type for ${fileName}`) } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/public/favicon.icois excluded by!**/*.ico
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/element-plus-case.test.js(2 hunks)packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/package.json(2 hunks)packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/router/index.js(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: push-check
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/package.json (2)
9-9: Verify module type compatibility with existing imports.Adding
"type": "module"changes how imports are resolved. Ensure all existing imports in the project are compatible with ES modules.
25-27: Review major version updates for breaking changes.The updates include major version bumps:
- @vitejs/plugin-vue: 4.x → 5.x
- @vitejs/plugin-vue-jsx: 3.x → 4.x
- vite: 4.x → 5.x
Please verify compatibility and review migration guides.
✅ Verification successful
The major version updates are safe to proceed with.
The codebase uses standard Vite configuration patterns that remain stable across these major versions. No deprecated features or breaking changes impact the current setup.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for Vite config files that might need updates fd "vite.config" --type f --exec cat {}Length of output: 65641
| for (const { fileName, path: filePath, fileContent } of genResult) { | ||
| fs.mkdirSync(path.resolve(__dirname, `./result/appdemo01/${filePath}`), { recursive: true }) | ||
| fs.writeFileSync( | ||
| path.resolve(__dirname, `./result/appdemo01/${filePath}/${fileName}`), | ||
| // 这里需要将换行符替换成 CRLF 格式的 | ||
| fileContent.replace(/\r?\n/g, '\r\n') | ||
| ) | ||
| }) | ||
|
|
||
| if (typeof fileContent === 'string') { | ||
| fs.writeFileSync( | ||
| path.resolve(__dirname, `./result/appdemo01/${filePath}/${fileName}`), | ||
| // 这里需要将换行符替换成 CRLF 格式的 | ||
| fileContent.replace(/\r?\n/g, '\r\n') | ||
| ) | ||
| } else if (fileContent instanceof Blob) { | ||
| const arrayBuffer = await fileContent.arrayBuffer() | ||
| const buffer = Buffer.from(arrayBuffer) | ||
|
|
||
| fs.writeFileSync(path.resolve(__dirname, `./result/appdemo01/${filePath}/${fileName}`), buffer) | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling for file operations.
The file writing logic lacks try-catch blocks for error handling. File system operations can fail for various reasons.
- for (const { fileName, path: filePath, fileContent } of genResult) {
+ for (const { fileName, path: filePath, fileContent } of genResult) {
+ try {
fs.mkdirSync(path.resolve(__dirname, `./result/appdemo01/${filePath}`), { recursive: true })
if (typeof fileContent === 'string') {
fs.writeFileSync(
path.resolve(__dirname, `./result/appdemo01/${filePath}/${fileName}`),
fileContent.replace(/\r?\n/g, '\r\n')
)
} else if (fileContent instanceof Blob) {
const arrayBuffer = await fileContent.arrayBuffer()
const buffer = Buffer.from(arrayBuffer)
fs.writeFileSync(path.resolve(__dirname, `./result/appdemo01/${filePath}/${fileName}`), buffer)
}
+ } catch (error) {
+ throw new Error(`Failed to write file ${fileName}: ${error.message}`)
+ }
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| for (const { fileName, path: filePath, fileContent } of genResult) { | |
| fs.mkdirSync(path.resolve(__dirname, `./result/appdemo01/${filePath}`), { recursive: true }) | |
| fs.writeFileSync( | |
| path.resolve(__dirname, `./result/appdemo01/${filePath}/${fileName}`), | |
| // 这里需要将换行符替换成 CRLF 格式的 | |
| fileContent.replace(/\r?\n/g, '\r\n') | |
| ) | |
| }) | |
| if (typeof fileContent === 'string') { | |
| fs.writeFileSync( | |
| path.resolve(__dirname, `./result/appdemo01/${filePath}/${fileName}`), | |
| // 这里需要将换行符替换成 CRLF 格式的 | |
| fileContent.replace(/\r?\n/g, '\r\n') | |
| ) | |
| } else if (fileContent instanceof Blob) { | |
| const arrayBuffer = await fileContent.arrayBuffer() | |
| const buffer = Buffer.from(arrayBuffer) | |
| fs.writeFileSync(path.resolve(__dirname, `./result/appdemo01/${filePath}/${fileName}`), buffer) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| for (const { fileName, path: filePath, fileContent } of genResult) { | |
| try { | |
| fs.mkdirSync(path.resolve(__dirname, `./result/appdemo01/${filePath}`), { recursive: true }) | |
| if (typeof fileContent === 'string') { | |
| fs.writeFileSync( | |
| path.resolve(__dirname, `./result/appdemo01/${filePath}/${fileName}`), | |
| // 这里需要将换行符替换成 CRLF 格式的 | |
| fileContent.replace(/\r?\n/g, '\r\n') | |
| ) | |
| } else if (fileContent instanceof Blob) { | |
| const arrayBuffer = await fileContent.arrayBuffer() | |
| const buffer = Buffer.from(arrayBuffer) | |
| fs.writeFileSync(path.resolve(__dirname, `./result/appdemo01/${filePath}/${fileName}`), buffer) | |
| } | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| throw new Error(`Failed to write file ${fileName}: ${error.message}`) | |
| } | |
| } |
English | 简体中文
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Background and solution
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Dependency Updates
Test Improvements