Support ESP-IDF 3.3 #14
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Are these changes (e.g., more stack and flash) required for building border router or building this demo itself? |
7 tasks
Building this demo itself. The demo always requires 2.1M flash according to partition table. And after update lwip, 5120B stack is not enough. According to current tests, a few more stack is required by weave after thread support is added. |
gerickson
suggested changes
Apr 28, 2020
erjiaqing
force-pushed
the
esp-3.3
branch
2 times, most recently
from
49633f9 to
1264513
Compare
- A few more components is required for esp-idf 3.3 - Need 6144B stack to avoid stackoverflow - The partition table requires 2.1M flash - Update travis CI to use ESP-IDF 3.3.2 Change-Id: Icc8e84d08f05996bbb309373f373e7540f833959
robszewczyk
approved these changes
Jul 28, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Ths CI might not pass since it requires openweave/openweave-core#567