Skip to content

Publish container image on release event#2129

Closed
kelson42 wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
publish-docker-on-release
Closed

Publish container image on release event#2129
kelson42 wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
publish-docker-on-release

Conversation

@kelson42
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

By publishing 1.14.0 I saw that this workflow what not OK. I suspect we will have to release an 1.14.1 to get everything done properly.

@kelson42 kelson42 requested a review from benoit74 January 12, 2025 16:29
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Jan 12, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 75.24%. Comparing base (363da15) to head (5b1fb7a).
Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2129      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   75.33%   75.24%   -0.10%     
==========================================
  Files          41       41              
  Lines        3207     3207              
  Branches      706      706              
==========================================
- Hits         2416     2413       -3     
- Misses        674      676       +2     
- Partials      117      118       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@audiodude
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Don't you still want the "on...push..." sections, because that's what publishes the :latest and :1.14 images?

@kelson42
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

It didn't because I don't want to start tags with "v".

@benoit74
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Problem is simply that #1921 is incorrect / incomplete, you need to create a v1.14.0 tag, not a 1.14.0, it has been so since multiple releases:

image

I will fix this situation, no need for 1.14.1, code is not changing in main since yesterday.

@benoit74
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I've updated #1921 (comment) so that it is in-line with other scrapers practices and level of details

@benoit74
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is done differently now, to be aligned with practices on other scrapers.

@benoit74 benoit74 closed this Jan 13, 2025
@kelson42
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

kelson42 commented Jan 13, 2025

@benoit74 I clearly didn't wanted to put at tag v... this is uselessly complicated and error prone. This rule to put a v before is just an heritage and IMHO should not be perpetuated. None of the softwares (maybe beside scrapers) uses this. What is the reason to put v...?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants