Skip to content

api: regenerate api code generation#4616

Merged
kingsleyzissou merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
update-apis
Jul 9, 2026
Merged

api: regenerate api code generation#4616
kingsleyzissou merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
update-apis

Conversation

@schutzbot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Update api code generation

@schutzbot schutzbot requested a review from a team as a code owner July 9, 2026 15:23
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

Scanned Files

None

@kingsleyzissou kingsleyzissou enabled auto-merge July 9, 2026 15:24

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey - I've left some high level feedback:

  • Consider extracting the common repository fields into a shared type/interface so version_count and its description don’t need to be repeated across the different ApiRepository*Response variants.
  • With fedora-45 added to the Distributions union, review any distribution-specific branching logic (e.g., switch/if chains or mapping objects) to ensure the new value is handled consistently with other Fedora versions.
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:

## Overall Comments
- Consider extracting the common repository fields into a shared type/interface so `version_count` and its description don’t need to be repeated across the different `ApiRepository*Response` variants.
- With `fedora-45` added to the `Distributions` union, review any distribution-specific branching logic (e.g., switch/if chains or mapping objects) to ensure the new value is handled consistently with other Fedora versions.

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jul 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 77.31%. Comparing base (648903c) to head (1e4c0b5).

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4616      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   77.33%   77.31%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         258      258              
  Lines        6856     6856              
  Branches     2490     2540      +50     
==========================================
- Hits         5302     5301       -1     
- Misses       1443     1444       +1     
  Partials      111      111              
Flag Coverage Δ
playwright 60.00% <ø> (-0.04%) ⬇️
vitest 71.53% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
see 1 file with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Harness.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 648903c...1e4c0b5. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@kingsleyzissou kingsleyzissou added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 9, 2026
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue Bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to no response for status checks Jul 9, 2026
@kingsleyzissou kingsleyzissou added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 9, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 8aa9915 Jul 9, 2026
37 of 43 checks passed
@kingsleyzissou kingsleyzissou deleted the update-apis branch July 9, 2026 22:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants